Performance of two model-free data interpretation methods for continuous monitoring of structures under environmental variations

Interpreting measurement data from continuous monitoring of civil structures for structural health monitoring (SHM) is a challenging task. This task is even more difficult when measurement data are influenced by environmental variations, such as temperature, wind and humidity. This paper investigates for the first time the performance of two model-free data interpretation methods: Moving Principal Component Analysis (MPCA) and Robust Regression Analysis (RRA) for monitoring civil structures that are influenced by temperature. The performance of the two methods is evaluated through two criteria: (1) damage detectability and (2) time to detection with respect to two factors: sensor-damage location and traffic loading intensity. Furthermore, the performance is studied in situations with and without filtering seasonal temperature variations through the use of a moving average filter. The study demonstrates that MPCA has higher damage detectability than RRA. RRA, on the other hand, detects damages faster than MPCA. Filtering seasonal temperature variations may reduce the time to detection of MPCA while the benefits are modest for RRA. MPCA and RRA should be considered as complementary methods for continuous monitoring of civil structures.

[1]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases , 2005 .

[2]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Model-free data interpretation for continuous monitoring of complex structures , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[3]  Jorge Vanegas.  Computing in Civil Engineering , 1996 .

[4]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring and Reliability Estimation: Long Span Truss Bridge Application With Environmental Monitoring Data , 2008 .

[5]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Identification of unusual events in multi-channel bridge monitoring data , 2004 .

[6]  Steven W. Smith,et al.  The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing , 1997 .

[7]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Model Identification of Bridges Using Measurement Data , 2005 .

[8]  C Koh,et al.  Output-only substructural identification for local damage detection , 2010 .

[9]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  On Structural Identification of Constructed Facilities , 1996 .

[10]  C. G. Koh,et al.  Challenges and Strategies in using Genetic Algorithms for Structural Identification , 2009 .

[11]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Methodologies for model-free data interpretation of civil engineering structures , 2010 .

[12]  Mohammad Noori,et al.  Wavelet-Based Approach for Structural Damage Detection , 2000 .

[13]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis , 2005 .

[14]  F. Lanata,et al.  Damage detection and localization for continuous static monitoring of structures using a proper orthogonal decomposition of signals , 2006 .

[15]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Evaluating two model-free data interpretation methods for measurements that are influenced by temperature , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[16]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Application of time series analysis for bridge monitoring , 2006 .

[17]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Multimodel Structural Performance Monitoring , 2010 .