Social Structural Influences on Meat Consumption

Meat production is a major hidden cause of many critical environmental problems, indicating that individual dietary habits are a form of environmentally significant consumption (ESC). We build upon the growing literature on ESC by analyzing the effects of social structural factors on the total meat and beef consumption of individuals. Our purpose here is to further our understanding of the factors that contribute to individual consumption patterns of environmentally significant commodities. Gender, race, ethnicity, location of residence (region and urban vs. non-urban), and social class all appear to affect dietary habits even when controlling for physiological variables such as body weight and age. We argue that social structural factors in combination with macro-economic structure and psychological factors provide a rich explanation of the consumption patterns of individuals.

[1]  E. T. Keil,et al.  Contemporary Vegetarianism in the U.K.: Challenge and Incorporation? , 1993, Appetite.

[2]  R. Goodland.  Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters , 1997 .

[3]  N. Fiddes.  Meat, a natural symbol , 1991 .

[4]  G. Paterson.  AAAS Atlas of Population and Environment [Book Review] , 2002 .

[5]  A. Beardsworth,et al.  The Vegetarian Option: Varieties, Conversions, Motives and Careers , 1992 .

[6]  A. Beardsworth,et al.  Health-related beliefs and dietary practices among vegetarians and vegans: a qualitative study , 1991 .

[7]  P. Stern,et al.  Gender, values, and environmentalism , 2002 .

[8]  Allan Schnaiberg,et al.  The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity , 1980 .

[9]  N. Myers.  The Hamburger connection: how Central America's forests become North America's hamburgers [rainforests, environmental degradation, pasture land, cattle raising] , 1981 .

[10]  C. Dutilh,et al.  Energy Consumption in the Food Chain , 2000 .

[11]  J. Robbins,et al.  Diet for a New America , 1987 .

[12]  Carl W. Condit,et al.  Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West , 1991 .

[13]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  The stork and the plow : the equity answer to the human dilemma , 1995 .

[14]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[15]  R. Cline-Cole,et al.  Food, Energy and Society. , 1982 .

[16]  L. Gofton,et al.  The World of Goods , 1981 .

[17]  R. Belk,et al.  Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities , 1989 .

[18]  J. Sobal,et al.  Eating agendas : food and nutrition as social problems , 1997 .

[19]  A. Beardsworth,et al.  Sociology on the Menu: An Invitation to the Study of Food and Society , 1997 .

[20]  J. Rifkin.  Beyond Beef: The Rise and Fall of the Cattle Culture , 1992 .

[21]  Grant Mccracken,et al.  New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities , 1989 .

[22]  A. Durning,et al.  Taking Stock: Animal Farming and the Environment , 1991 .

[23]  A. Schnaiberg,et al.  Environment and Society the Enduring Conflict , 1994 .

[24]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Environmentally significant consumption : research directions , 1997 .

[25]  Paul J. Harrison,et al.  AAAS atlas of population & environment , 2000 .

[26]  S. Sapp,et al.  Social acceptability and intentions to eat beef: an expansion of the Fishbein-Ajzen model using reference group theory , 1989 .

[27]  S. Subak.  Global environmental costs of beef production , 1999 .

[28]  F. Lappé.  Diet for a Small Planet , 1971 .