Blended learning in vocational education: teachers’ conceptions of blended learning and their approaches to teaching and design

This paper presents research exploring teachers’ experiences of using blended learning in vocational education. Teachers involved in designing and teaching using blended learning from a major Australian vocational education provider participated in the study. They received open-ended questionnaires asking to describe their conceptions of blended learning and their approaches to teaching and design for blended learning environments. Teachers’ responses were content-analysed from a phenomenographic perspective. Their descriptions illustrate a relatively wide spectrum of ideas about the nature of blended learning, suggesting that teachers tend to have qualitatively different conceptions about blended learning, and tend to adopt qualitatively different approaches to both teaching and design for blended learning. Quantitative analyses investigating possible relationships between teachers’ conceptions and approaches were also conducted. Implications of the findings for further research and practice are discussed.

[1]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[2]  Ference Marton,et al.  On the unit of description in phenomenography , 2005 .

[3]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Keith Wood,et al.  The experience of learning to teach: Changing student teachers' ways of understanding teaching , 2000 .

[5]  Christine S. Bruce.  Frameworks guiding the analysis: applied to or derived from the data? , 2003 .

[6]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[7]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory , 2004 .

[8]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Shared and personal learning spaces: Challenges for pedagogical design , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  David Kember,et al.  Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning , 1993 .

[10]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[11]  John A Bowden,et al.  Reflections on the Phenomenographic Team Research Process , 2005 .

[12]  Philip Taylor,et al.  A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching , 1994 .

[13]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods , 2005 .

[14]  Dennis Beach,et al.  Phenomenography — a “good‐for‐nothing brother” of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis , 1997 .

[15]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Using Phenomenography in the Design of Programs for Teachers in Higher Education , 1997 .

[16]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Growing and Developing as a University Teacher--Variation in Meaning , 2003 .

[17]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[18]  Nick Rushby.  An introduction to educational computing , 1979 .

[19]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective , 1996 .

[20]  Harvey Singh,et al.  Building Effective Blended Learning Programs , 2021, Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks.

[21]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[22]  F. Marton,et al.  The Experience of Learning , 1984 .

[23]  David Kember,et al.  Lecturers’ Approaches to Teaching and their Relationship to Conceptions of Good Teaching , 2000 .

[24]  G. Benfield,et al.  The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice , 2006 .

[25]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[26]  Nira Hativa,et al.  Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education , 2002 .

[27]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers , 1992 .

[28]  Michael Prosser,et al.  The “How” and “What” of learning physics , 1989 .

[29]  Pam Green,et al.  Doing developmental phenomenography , 2005 .

[30]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[31]  David Kember,et al.  Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning , 1994 .

[32]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[33]  Jim Butler,et al.  The learning context within technical and further education colleges as perceived by apprentices and their workplace supervisors , 1998 .

[34]  R. Ellis,et al.  Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[35]  Mark Campbell,et al.  What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[36]  R. Ellis,et al.  Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design , 2006 .

[37]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science , 1994 .

[38]  T. Husén,et al.  The International Encyclopedia of Education , 1994 .

[39]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  A new dimension to understanding university teaching , 2004 .

[40]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Students’ Approaches to Learning and Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education , 2005 .