A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Mechanical stimuli are one of the factors that affect cell proliferation and differentiation in the process of bone tissue regeneration. Knowledge on the specific deformation sensed by cells at a microscopic level when mechanical loads are applied is still missing in the development of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. The objective of this study was to analyze the behavior of the mechanical stimuli within some calcium phosphate-based scaffolds in terms of stress and strain distributions in the solid material phase and fluid velocity, fluid pressure and fluid shear stress distributions in the pores filled of fluid, by means of micro computed tomographed (CT)-based finite element (FE) models. Two samples of porous materials, one of calcium phosphate-based cement and another of biodegradable glass, were used. Compressive loads equivalent to 0.5% of compression applied to the solid material phase and interstitial fluid flows with inlet velocities of 1, 10 and 100 microm/s applied to the interconnected pores were simulated, changing also the inlet side and the viscosity of the medium. Similar strain distributions for both materials were found, with compressive and tensile strain maximal values of 1.6% and 0.6%, respectively. Mean values were consistent with the applied deformation. When 10 microm/s of inlet fluid velocity and 1.45 Pas viscosity, maximal values of fluid velocity were 12.76 mm/s for CaP cement and 14.87 mm/s for glass. Mean values were consistent with the inlet ones applied, and mean values of shear stress were around 5 x 10(-5)Pa. Variations on inlet fluid velocity and fluid viscosity produce proportional and independent changes in fluid velocity, fluid shear stress and fluid pressure. This study has shown how mechanical loads and fluid flow applied on the scaffolds cause different levels of mechanical stimuli within the samples according to the morphology of the materials.

[1]  H. Wiesmann,et al.  Design and performance of a bioreactor system for mechanically promoted three-dimensional tissue engineering. , 2006, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Robert E Guldberg,et al.  Fluid flow increases type II collagen deposition and tensile mechanical properties in bioreactor-grown tissue-engineered cartilage. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[4]  S C Cowin,et al.  Mechanosensation and fluid transport in living bone. , 2002, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[5]  Jos Vander Sloten,et al.  Micro-CT-based screening of biomechanical and structural properties of bone tissue engineering scaffolds , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  J. Planell,et al.  In vivo evaluation of an injectable Macroporous Calcium Phosphate Cement , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[7]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[8]  I Naert,et al.  Individualised, micro CT-based finite element modelling as a tool for biomechanical analysis related to tissue engineering of bone. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[9]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Flow Perfusion Culture of Marrow Stromal Cells Seeded on Porous Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Ceramics , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Theo H Smit,et al.  Dynamic shear stress in parallel-plate flow chambers. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  D. Wendt,et al.  The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[13]  Ying Yang,et al.  Enhancement of Mechanical Signals for Tissue Engineering , 2005 .

[14]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[15]  Gabriele Dubini,et al.  Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: a micro-CT based model. , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  Roger Zauel,et al.  3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Dietmar Werner Hutmacher,et al.  Application of micro CT and computation modeling in bone tissue engineering , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  M Navarro,et al.  Surface characterization and cell response of a PLA/CaP glass biodegradable composite material. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  L. Fassina,et al.  Calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells inside a polyurethane porous scaffold, using a perfusion bioreactor. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[22]  J. Planell,et al.  Effect of Albumen as Protein-Based Foaming Agent in a Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement , 2003 .

[23]  Robert E Guldberg,et al.  Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded three-dimensional bone constructs in vitro. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[24]  D. Wendt,et al.  Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three‐dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.