A prostate CAD system based on multiparametric analysis of DCE T1-w, and DW automatically registered images

Prostate specific antigen (PSA)-based screening reduces the rate of death from prostate cancer (PCa) by 31%, but this benefit is associated with a high risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. As prostate transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, the standard procedure for prostate histological sampling, has a sensitivity of 77% with a considerable false-negative rate, more accurate methods need to be found to detect or rule out significant disease. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to improve the specificity of PSA-based screening scenarios as a non-invasive detection tool, in particular exploiting the combination of anatomical and functional information in a multiparametric framework. The purpose of this study was to describe a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) method that automatically produces a malignancy likelihood map by combining information from dynamic contrast enhanced MR images and diffusion weighted images. The CAD system consists of multiple sequential stages, from a preliminary registration of images of different sequences, in order to correct for susceptibility deformation and/or movement artifacts, to a Bayesian classifier, which fused all the extracted features into a probability map. The promising results (AUROC=0.87) should be validated on a larger dataset, but they suggest that the discrimination on a voxel basis between benign and malignant tissues is feasible with good performances. This method can be of benefit to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the radiologist, reduce reader variability and speed up the reading time, automatically highlighting probably cancer suspicious regions.

[1]  Vladimir Cherkassky,et al.  Image denoising using wavelet thresholding and model selection , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[2]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Multiparametric MRI and prostate cancer diagnosis and risk stratification , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[3]  F. Beuvon,et al.  Value of Multiparametric MRI in the Work-up of Prostate Cancer , 2012, Current Urology Reports.

[4]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Automatic Determination of Arterial Input Function for Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI in Tumor Assessment , 2008, MICCAI.

[5]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Comparative evaluation of multiresolution optimization strategies for multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  P. Castorina,et al.  Classification scheme for phenomenological universalities in growth problems in physics and other sciences. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[8]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Mark A Horsfield,et al.  Algorithms for calculation of kinetic parameters from T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  Computational Statistics Handbook with MATLAB , 2001 .

[12]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.