Comparative Analysis Of Production Control Systems Through Simulation

This paper presents a comparative analysis of seven different production control systems in a complex factory setup through computer simulation. Batch size, arrival rate, inter-arrival time, and maintenance type are the input parameters to the model. Work-in-process (WIP) and throughput (TH) are the system performance measurement output parameters. The study shows that a pull-based system does not outperform a push-based system with respect to WIP under all conditions. Pull-based systems prefer a smaller batch size to better control WIP. Each of the seven production control systems performs best at a specific inter-arrival time, although it is different for each system. Preventive maintenance is preferred over repair maintenance in a pull system and in a just-in-time (JIT) system. The computer simulation confirms that no single production control system is best under all conditions. The performance of a production control system depends not only on the type of manufacturing strategy chosen, but also on the values of the input parameters. This research shows that it makes no sense to comment on the superiority of one strategy over another without regard to the value of input parameters and the type of factory setup.

[1]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Manufacturing control with a push-pull approach , 1998 .

[2]  Jing-Wen Li.  Simulation-based comparison of push and pull systems in a job-shop environment considering the context of JIT implementation , 2003 .

[3]  Willard I. Zangwill,et al.  Variance Effects in Cyclic Production Systems , 1991 .

[4]  Michael J. Magazine,et al.  Push and pull strategies for controlling multistage production systems , 2000 .

[5]  Bhaba R. Sarker,et al.  A Review of:“Factory Physics: Foundations of Manufacturing Management” Wallace J. Hopp and Mark L. Spearman Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1996 , 1997 .

[6]  Martha Lair Sale,et al.  Survey-based comparison of performance and change in performance of firms using traditional manufacturing, JIT and TOC , 2003 .

[7]  J. Miltenburg.  Comparing JIT, MRP and TOC, and embedding TOC into MRP , 1997 .

[8]  Mahesh Gupta,et al.  Constraints management--recent advances and practices , 2003 .

[9]  Lloyd J. Taylor,et al.  A simulation study of WIP inventory drive systems and their effect on financial measurements , 1999 .

[10]  Michael H. Mayer,et al.  WITNESS simulation software: a flexible suite of simulation tools , 1997, WSC '97.

[11]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban , 1990 .

[12]  S. Rahman,et al.  Theory of constraints , 1998 .

[13]  Farzad Mahmoodi,et al.  Impactof maintenance policies onthe performance of manufacturing cells , 1997 .

[14]  Satya S. Chakravorty,et al.  Do JIT lines perform better than traditionally balanced lines , 1995 .

[15]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Effect of maintenance policies on FMS failures , 1992 .

[16]  John S. W. Fargher.  There shops, three strategies: Using MRP-II, JIT, and TOC in remanufacturing cells , 1997 .

[17]  Charles R. Standridge,et al.  Analysis in Manufacturing Systems Simulation: A Case Study , 1994, Simul..

[18]  Brian L. Slobodow.  Simulation of a plant-wide inventory pull system , 1993, WSC '93.

[19]  Donald R. Smith,et al.  Understanding the fundamentals of Kanban and CONWIP pull systems using simulation , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[20]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Setting WIP levels with statistical throughput control (STC) in CONWIP production lines , 1998 .

[21]  Satya S. Chakravorty,et al.  A comparative study of line design approaches for serial production systems , 1996 .

[22]  Lie-Fern Hsu.  Optimal preventive maintenance policies in a serial production system , 1991 .

[23]  Heinrich Kuhn,et al.  Analysis of production control systems kanban and CONWIP , 1996 .

[24]  Jeffery K. Cochran,et al.  Optimum junction point location and inventory levels in serial hybrid push/pull production systems , 1998 .

[25]  Purushothaman Damodaran,et al.  Comparison of push and pull systems with transporters: A metamodelling approach , 2002 .

[26]  Jan Olhager,et al.  An integrated push-pull manufacturing strategy , 1990 .

[27]  J. Jeon,et al.  The development of a hybrid intelligent maintenance optimisation system (HIMOS) , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..