An integrated FAHP-MCGP approach to project selection and resource allocation in risk-based internal audit planning: A case study

Abstract Effective audit planning could drive internal audit function to be the catalyst for company development by launching audit projects that protect and create organization value. In the risk-based internal audit planning process, once risk assessment is completed, audit projects should be selected and resources are allocated accordingly. However, an optimal annual audit plan cannot be realized based on subjective selection of projects and manual distribution of available hours merely. In the planning process, the risk level that can be mitigated by performing individual audit project is vague and there is also uncertainty with the time to be spent on each project. By developing a structured three-phase framework for risk-based audit planning, this paper proposes a novel approach that combines fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and multi-choice goal programming (MCGP) to fill the gap between prioritization and allocation technique. An exploratory estimation of risk reduction factor for each candidate project is performed using FAHP, and then MCGP assists in making a more informed choice so as to minimize the total deviations from predefined goals concerning the risk coverage, flexibility and optimal mix of project portfolio. A real case study of annual audit plan for a global internal audit team is presented to illustrate how the proposed FAHP-MCGP approach could be applied in practice. The results of this research indicate that the proposed FAHP-MCGP approach is a useful tool for selecting potential projects and allocating staff time during risk-based internal audit panning and has substantial practical application.

[1]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application , 2008 .

[2]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  A Note on the Paper "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: Fallacy of the Popular Methods" , 2015, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[3]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[4]  Yu Jing,et al.  A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Nurhan Davutyan,et al.  An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to the Evaluation of Audit Risk: A Reinterpretation , 2005 .

[6]  R. Craig,et al.  Factors associated with the adoption of risk-based internal auditing , 2009 .

[7]  Charles Scawthorn,et al.  Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Multi-choice goal programming , 2007 .

[9]  Hennie A. Kruger,et al.  A combined AHP-GP model to allocate internal auditing time to projects , 2006 .

[10]  Andreas G. Koutoupis,et al.  Risk based internal auditing within Greek banks: a case study approach , 2009 .

[11]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[12]  Andrew D. Bailey,et al.  Risk assessment in internal auditing: a neural network approach , 1999 .

[13]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Li Xin,et al.  Research on emerging technology selection and assessment by technology foresight and fuzzy consistent matrix , 2010 .

[15]  Ching-Ter Chang Revised multi-choice goal programming , 2008 .

[16]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[17]  Eugene B. Lieb,et al.  Du Pont Uses a Decision Support System to Select Its Audit Portfolio , 1996 .

[18]  Abdel-Aziz M. Mohamed Operations Research Applications in Audit Planning and Scheduling , 2015 .

[19]  Andrés Suárez-García,et al.  Multi-criteria risk assessment: Case study of a large hydroelectric project , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  Carlos Romero,et al.  A survey of generalized goal programming (1970–1982) , 1986 .

[21]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[22]  Chu-Sing Yang,et al.  Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Repairing Inconsistent Comparison Matrices , 2014 .

[23]  Amy H. I. Lee,et al.  An evaluation framework for product planning using FANP, QFD and multi-choice goal programming , 2010 .

[24]  Mélanie Roussy,et al.  New Perspectives in Internal Audit Research: A Structured Literature Review , 2018, Accounting Perspectives.

[25]  Chu-Sing Yang,et al.  Repairing the Inconsistent Fuzzy Preference Matrix Using Multiobjective PSO , 2015, Adv. Fuzzy Syst..

[26]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new approach based on soft computing to accelerate the selection of new product ideas , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[27]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Enhancing China's energy security: determining influential factors and effective strategic measures , 2014 .

[28]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[29]  Wei-Chih Wang,et al.  Automatic repair of inconsistent pairwise weighting matrices in analytic hierarchy process , 2012 .

[30]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  A Comparative Study Between Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Fuzzy Variants: A Perspective Based on Two Linguistic Models , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[31]  Debashis Dutta,et al.  MULTI-CHOICE GOAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH FOR A FUZZY TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM , 2010 .

[32]  T. Saaty There is no mathematical validity for using fuzzy number crunching in the analytic hierarchy process , 2006 .

[33]  R. Ravindran,et al.  A Goal Programming Appligation for Army Officer Accession Planning , 2005 .

[34]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Topology design of remote patient monitoring system concerning qualitative and quantitative issues , 2019 .

[35]  Marleen Willekens,et al.  A risk-based allocation of internal audit time - a case-study , 1996 .

[36]  G. Azzone,et al.  Identifying Organizational Drivers of Internal Audit Effectiveness , 2009 .

[37]  Marc Eulerich,et al.  The evolution of internal audit research: a bibliometric analysis of published documents (1926–2016) , 2019, Accounting History Review.

[38]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Wen-Chyuan Chiang,et al.  A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Ching-Ter Chang Multi-choice goal programming model for the optimal location of renewable energy facilities , 2015 .

[41]  Suraj Bandichode,et al.  Modality of Particle Swarm Optimization to Improve Decision Making Process of Analytical Hierarchy Processing * , 2018, HELIX.

[42]  Kèyù Zhü,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[45]  S. Hartoyo,et al.  The Implementation of Risk Management in the Internal Audit Planning in the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources , 2017 .

[46]  William Ho,et al.  The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  Supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi-choice goal programming , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[48]  Samuel Yousefi,et al.  An integrated Taguchi loss function–fuzzy cognitive map–MCGP with utility function approach for supplier selection problem , 2018, Neural Computing and Applications.

[49]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Sylvain Kubler,et al.  A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[51]  Sonia,et al.  Multi-choice programming: an overview of theories and applications , 2017 .

[52]  Pornwasin Sirisawat,et al.  Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[53]  Yau Min,et al.  Fuzzy consistent matrix and its application , 1997 .

[54]  Mustafa Elkasih Abdulkarim,et al.  Goal programming model for management accounting and auditing: a new typology , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[55]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Fuzzy Judgments and Fuzzy Sets , 2010, Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci..

[56]  Giuseppe D'Onza,et al.  Internal Auditing and Risk Assessment in Large Italian Companies: an Empirical Survey , 2003 .