Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review

Objective. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data. Design. Systematic review. Population. Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. Methods. We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1953–2009), EMBASE (1980–2009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications. Main outcome measures. Contraindications of ECV. Results. We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. Conclusion. The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.

[1]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[2]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Consequences of the Term Breech Trial in Denmark , 2011, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  Max E Valentinuzzi,et al.  SAFETY AND EFFICACY , 2010 .

[4]  M. Rijnders,et al.  Prevalence, outcome, and women's experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. , 2010, Birth.

[5]  E. Sullivan,et al.  Term breech singletons and caesarean section: A population study, Australia 1991–2005 , 2009, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[6]  Y. Ezra,et al.  Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[7]  J. Cnossen,et al.  Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta‐analysis , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  H. Abenhaim,et al.  External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature , 2009, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[9]  J. Cnossen,et al.  Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  B. Mol,et al.  External Cephalic Version–Related Risks: A Meta-analysis , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  S. Bewley,et al.  Peer review and the Term Breech Trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[12]  Hofmeyr Gj,et al.  External cephalic version for breech presentation at term (Review) , 2007 .

[13]  EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AND REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF BREECH PRESENTATION , 2006 .

[14]  E. Magann,et al.  External cephalic version with an amniotic fluid index ⩽10: A systematic review , 2005, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[15]  P. Elferink-Stinkens,et al.  The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  S. Oei,et al.  External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version‐related risks , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[17]  M. Boucher,et al.  The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  G. Visser,et al.  Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33,824 infants , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  M. Katz,et al.  Placental abruption in term pregnancies: clinical significance and obstetric risk factors , 2003, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[20]  C. Lockwood,et al.  Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery , 2002 .

[21]  G. Weiss,et al.  Mode of term singleton breech delivery , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  P. Kyle,et al.  Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term , 2002, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[23]  V. Berghella Prolapsed cord after external cephalic version in a patient with premature rupture of membranes and transverse lie. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[24]  T. Leung,et al.  A survey of pregnant women's attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic version , 2000, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[25]  B. Brost,et al.  External cephalic version after rupture of membranes. , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  G. Magnin,et al.  External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a series of 38 cases. , 1998, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[28]  S. Bewley,et al.  The introduction of external cephalic version at term into routine clinical practice. , 1993, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[29]  R. Laros,et al.  Management of term breech presentation. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Management of breech presentation at term. , 1973, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.