Time delay and communication bandwidth limitation on telerobotic control

Remote teleoperation allows humans to extend their capabilities to environments too dangerous for biological organisms. The communication between the operator and the robot needs to be fast in order to accommodate quick interaction with the environment. However, certain remote environments, such as deep-sea and space operations, impose restrictions on the communication link which limits the available bandwidth. In addition, as the distance increases, the communication between the operator and robot is further handicapped by significant time delays. The difficulties of controlling a robotic system remotely with long time delays and limited communication bandwidth are investigated. Four subjects performed a manipulator positioning task, controlling a simulated seven-joint manipulator under various time delay and communication rates. Results confirm performance degradation for 1.5, 3, and 6-second round trip delays. Compared to no delay, the time to complete the task increased between 160% and 480%. Limiting the communication bandwidth from 20 Hz also degraded performance, but not as severely as time delay. Only a 36% increase in completion time occurred when the bandwidth was reduced by a factor of eight to 2.5 Hz. A novel predictive display was introduced which dramatically decreased completion times to levels similar to no delay being present.

[1]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Variable force and visual feedback effects on teleoperator man/machine performance , 1989 .

[2]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  ROTEX-the first remotely controlled robot in space , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  R. Held,et al.  Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. , 1966 .

[4]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Telepresence, time delay and adaptation , 1991 .

[5]  Daniel F. Wallace,et al.  The Influence of Frame Rate and Resolution Reduction on Human Performance , 1992 .

[6]  William R. Ferrell,et al.  Remote manipulation with transmission delay. , 1965 .

[7]  David L. Akin,et al.  Human factors optimization of virtual environment attributes for a space telerobotic control station , 2000 .

[8]  Linda Elizabeth Mar Human control performance in operation of a time-delayed master-slave telemanipulator , 1985 .

[9]  Mark Vincent Noyes,et al.  Superposition of graphics on low bit rate video as an aid in teleoperation , 1984 .

[10]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[11]  P. Backes Supervised Autonomy for Space Telerobotics , 1993 .

[12]  James Hampton Black Factorial study of remote manipulation with transmission of time delay. , 1971 .

[13]  Won S. Kim,et al.  Predictive displays and shared compliance control for time-delayed telemanipulation , 1990, EEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Towards a New Frontier of Applications.

[14]  Vivek Ranadivé Video resolution, frame rate and grayscale tradeoffs under limited bandwidth for undersea teleoperation , 1980 .