Effect of X-Ray Tube Configuration on Measurement of Key Soil Fertility Attributes with XRF

The successful use of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) sensors for soil analysis requires the selection of an optimal procedure of data acquisition and a simple modelling approach. This work aimed at assessing the performance of a portable XRF (XRF) sensor set up with two different X-ray tube configurations (combinations of voltage and current) to predict nine key soil fertility attributes: (clay, organic matter (OM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), pH, base saturation (V), and extractable nutrients (P, K, Ca, and Mg). An XRF, operated at a voltage of 15 kV (and current of 23 mu A) and 35 kV (and current of 7 mu A), was used for analyzing 102 soil samples collected from two agricultural fields in Brazil. Two different XRF data analysis scenarios were used to build the predictive models: (i) 10 emission lines of 15 keV spectra (EL-15), and (ii) 12 emission lines of 35 keV spectra (EL-35). Multiple linear regressions (MLR) were used for model calibration, and the models' prediction performance was evaluated using different figures of merit. The results show that although X-ray tube configuration affected the intensity of the emission lines of the different elements detected, it did not influence the prediction accuracy of the studied key fertility attributes, suggesting that both X-ray tube configurations tested can be used for future analyses. Satisfactory predictions with residual prediction deviation (RPD) >= 1.54 and coefficient of determination (R-2) >= 0.61 were obtained for eight out of the ten studied soil fertility attributes (clay, OM, CEC, V, and extractable K, Ca, and Mg). In addition, simple MLR models with a limited number of emission lines was effective for practical soil analysis of the key soil fertility attributes (except pH and extractable P) using XRF. The simple and transparent methodology suggested also enables future researches that seek to optimize the XRF scanning time in order to speed up the XRF analysis in soil samples.

[1]  L. A. Currie,et al.  LIMITS FOR QUALITATIVE DETECTION AND QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION. APPLICATION TO RADIOCHEMISTRY. , 1968 .

[2]  J. Molin,et al.  SENSOR SYSTEMS FOR MAPPING SOIL FERTILITY ATTRIBUTES: CHALLENGES, ADVANCES, AND PERSPECTIVES IN BRAZILIAN TROPICAL SOILS , 2019, Engenharia Agrícola.

[3]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Soil sensing: A new paradigm for agriculture , 2016 .

[4]  N. Curi,et al.  Multiple linear regression and random forest to predict and map soil properties using data from portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF). , 2017 .

[5]  Abdul Mounem Mouazen,et al.  Delineation of Soil Management Zones for Variable-Rate Fertilization: A Review , 2017 .

[6]  H. Carvalho,et al.  Laboratory Microprobe X-Ray Fluorescence in Plant Science: Emerging Applications and Case Studies , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[7]  David C. Weindorf,et al.  Characterizing soils via portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 2. Spodic and Albic horizons , 2012 .

[8]  D. Yılmaz,et al.  The use of scattering peaks for matrix effect correction in WDXRF analysis , 2018, Radiation Physics and Chemistry.

[9]  Michele Duarte de Menezes,et al.  Proximal Sensing and Digital Terrain Models Applied to Digital Soil Mapping and Modeling of Brazilian Latosols (Oxisols) , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[10]  André F. Lavorante,et al.  Relationship between acidity and chemical properties of brazilian soils , 2003 .

[11]  H. S. Mahmood,et al.  Sensing soil properties in the laboratory, in situ, and on-Line: A review , 2012 .

[12]  C. Schaefer,et al.  Minerals in the clay fraction of Brazilian Latosols (Oxisols): a review , 2008, Clay Minerals.

[13]  Somsubhra Chakraborty,et al.  Portable X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry analysis of soils , 2016, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[14]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Assessment of soil properties in situ using a prototype portable MIR spectrometer in two agricultural fields , 2016 .

[15]  William J. Welch,et al.  Computer-aided design of experiments , 1981 .

[16]  R. Zhao,et al.  Multi‐sensor fusion for the determination of several soil properties in the Yangtze River Delta, China , 2018, European Journal of Soil Science.

[17]  David C. Weindorf,et al.  Characterizing soils using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 1. Soil texture , 2011 .

[18]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  An assessment of model averaging to improve predictive power of portable vis-NIR and XRF for the determination of agronomic soil properties , 2016 .

[19]  F. R. Santos,et al.  EDXRF spectral data combined with PLSR to determine some soil fertility indicators , 2020 .

[20]  F. Bingham,et al.  Redistribution of Exchangeable Calcium, Magnesium, and Aluminum Following Lime or Gypsum Applications to a Brazilian Oxisol1 , 1984 .

[21]  Keith D. Shepherd,et al.  Mid‐Infrared and Total X‐Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Complementarity for Assessment of Soil Properties , 2015 .

[22]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[23]  Christina Streli,et al.  Energy Dispersive, X‐Ray Fluorescence Analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Dandan Wang,et al.  Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 4. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) , 2015 .

[25]  Said Nawar,et al.  Can spectral analyses improve measurement of key soil fertility parameters with X-ray fluorescence spectrometry? , 2019, Geoderma.

[26]  Tiago Rodrigues Tavares,et al.  Simplifying Sample Preparation for Soil Fertility Analysis by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry † , 2019, Sensors.

[27]  Somsubhra Chakraborty,et al.  Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 3. Soil reaction (pH) , 2014 .

[28]  Bin Li,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of key properties of arid soil by combined PXRF and Vis–NIR data , 2016 .

[29]  E. J. Kamprath,et al.  Soil Acidity and Liming: I. Effect of the Extracting Solution Cation and pH on the Removal of Aluminum from Acid Soils , 1983 .

[30]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Soil Science in Tropical and Temperate Regions—Some Differences and Similarities , 2002 .

[31]  S. Chakraborty,et al.  Prediction of soil fertility via portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry and soil texture in the Brazilian Coastal Plains , 2020 .

[32]  Henry Carrillo,et al.  pH Measurement IoT System for Precision Agriculture Applications , 2019, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[33]  I. Bald,et al.  Multivariate chemometrics as a key tool for prediction of K and Fe in a diverse German agricultural soil-set using EDXRF , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[34]  D. Weindorf,et al.  Elemental analysis of Cerrado agricultural soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: Inferences for soil fertility assessment , 2019, Geoderma.

[35]  Neil McKenzie,et al.  Proximal Soil Sensing: An Effective Approach for Soil Measurements in Space and Time , 2011 .

[36]  H. Ramon,et al.  Effect of Wavelength Range on the Measurement Accuracy of Some Selected Soil Constituents Using Visual-Near Infrared Spectroscopy , 2006 .

[37]  Elen Alvarenga Silva,et al.  Advances in Tropical Soil Characterization via Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry , 2019, Pedosphere.

[38]  R.,et al.  Properties and distribution of iron oxides and their association with minor elements in the soils of south-western Australia , 2005 .

[39]  Bin Li,et al.  Determination of base saturation percentage in agricultural soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer , 2019, Geoderma.

[40]  C. Nascimento,et al.  Comparison of USEPA digestion methods to heavy metals in soil samples , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[41]  Roberto Cesareo,et al.  X-Ray fluorescence spectrometry , 2002 .

[42]  Robert A. Meyers,et al.  Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry : applications, theory and instrumentation , 2000 .

[43]  Eugene P. Bertin,et al.  Introduction to X-Ray Spectrometric Analysis , 1978 .

[44]  D. Weindorf,et al.  Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry applied to the prediction of chemical attributes in Inceptisols under different land uses , 2018, Ciência e Agrotecnologia.

[45]  J. Watson,et al.  Energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis of silicate rocks for major and trace elements , 1984 .

[46]  C. Hurburgh,et al.  Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy–Principal Components Regression Analyses of Soil Properties , 2001 .

[47]  F. L. Melquiades,et al.  Quick analysis of organic matter in soil by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence and multivariate analysis. , 2017, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[48]  A. Hartemink,et al.  Data fusion of vis–NIR and PXRF spectra to predict soil physical and chemical properties , 2019, European Journal of Soil Science.

[49]  A. Legin,et al.  Application of chemometric methods to XRF-data - A tutorial review. , 2018, Analytica chimica acta.

[50]  C. Bowers.  Matrix Effect Corrections in X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry , 2019, Journal of Chemical Education.

[51]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science , 2010 .

[52]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[53]  Lloyd A. Currie,et al.  Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination , 1968 .