Correction for arterial‐tissue delay and dispersion in absolute quantitative cerebral perfusion DSC MR imaging

The singular value decomposition deconvolution of cerebral tissue concentration–time curves with the arterial input function is commonly used in dynamic susceptibility contrast cerebral perfusion MR imaging. However, it is sensitive to the time discrepancy between the arrival of the bolus in the tissue concentration–time curve and the arterial input function signal. This normally causes inaccuracy in the quantitative perfusion maps due to delay and dispersion effects. A comprehensive correction algorithm has been achieved through slice‐dependent time‐shifting of the arterial input function, and a delay‐dependent dispersion correction model. The correction algorithm was tested in 11 healthy subjects and three ischemic stroke patients scanned with a quantitative perfusion pulse sequence at 1.5 T. A validation study was performed on five patients with confirmed cerebrovascular occlusive disease scanned with MRI and positron emission tomography at 3.0 T. A significant effect (P < 0.05) was reported on the quantitative cerebral blood flow and mean transit time measurements (up to 50%). There was no statistically significant effect on the quantitative cerebral blood volume values. The in vivo results were in agreement with the simulation results, as well as previous literature. This minimizes the bias in patient diagnosis due to the existing errors and artifacts in dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Analysis of partial volume effects on arterial input functions using gradient echo: A simulation study , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  M. Reiser,et al.  Deconvolution of bolus-tracking data: a comparison of discretization methods , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Wanyong Shin,et al.  SCALE-PWI: A Pulse Sequence for Absolute Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion Imaging , 2011, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  J. Detre,et al.  Reduced Transit-Time Sensitivity in Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Cerebral Blood Flow , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Egill Rostrup,et al.  Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T1‐weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  I. Kanno,et al.  Effect of regional tracer delay on CBF in healthy subjects measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with 15O-PET. , 2005, Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences.

[8]  R Frayne,et al.  Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  R Frayne,et al.  Is correction necessary when clinically determining quantitative cerebral perfusion parameters from multi-slice dynamic susceptibility contrast MR studies? , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  R. Buxton Quantifying CBF with arterial spin labeling , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Wanyong Shin,et al.  Quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Evaluation of reproducibility and age‐ and gender‐dependence with fully automatic image postprocessing algorithm , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D. Gadian,et al.  Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Simulations using singular value decomposition , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  B. Rosen,et al.  Tracer arrival timing‐insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block‐circulant deconvolution matrix , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  W D Heiss,et al.  Tissue at Risk of Infarction Rescued by Early Reperfusion: A Positron Emission Tomography Study in Systemic Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis of Acute Stroke , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  Wanyong Shin,et al.  Method for improving the accuracy of quantitative cerebral perfusion imaging , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Jeroen van der Grond,et al.  Partial volume effects on arterial input functions: Shape and amplitude distortions and their correction , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Richard Frayne,et al.  MR Perfusion and Diffusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Human Gray and White Matter have Different Thresholds for Infarction , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  V. Haughton,et al.  Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[22]  John J. Lee,et al.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with localized arterial input functions , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  S Warach,et al.  A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  C. Starmer,et al.  Indicator Transit Time Considered as a Gamma Variate , 1964, Circulation research.

[25]  K Sartor,et al.  Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  T. Carroll,et al.  Quantitative CBV measurement from static T1 changes in tissue and correction for intravascular water exchange , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Ole Henriksen,et al.  Indicator Methods for Measurement of Organ and Tissue Blood Flow , 2011 .

[28]  A. Connelly,et al.  Improved deconvolution of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus delay and dispersion , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  M Mischi,et al.  On the physical and stochastic representation of an indicator dilution curve as a gamma variate , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[30]  I. Kanno,et al.  Tracer Delay Correction of Cerebral Blood Flow with Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MRI , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.