Identifying the sources of flight inefficiency from historical aircraft trajectories. A set of distance- and fuel-based performance indicators for post-operational analysis.

In this paper a set of new performance indicators (PIs) aiming to capture the environmental impact of aircraft operations is proposed. Its contribution is threefold: optimal trajectories are computed to compare them with historical trajectories and derive several flight efficiency PIs; a family of fuel-based PIs is proposed, where fuel is estimated only from surveillance trajectory datasets not requiring confidential data; and different PIs and variants are proposed aiming to decouple and to identify different sources of environmental inefficiencies, distinguishing those that could be attributed to the different layers of air traffic management (ATM), and those attributable to the airspace users (AUs). A case study is presented for two different days, where flight inefficiency was assessed with the proposed PIs for all traffic crossing the FABEC airspace during a 24h period. Main results show that average fuel inefficiencies that could be attributable to ATM are around 250 kg (7.8%) when a full free route without en-route charges scenario at maximum range operations is considered as reference for the optimal trajectories. AUs induced fuel inefficiencies (due to flying faster than the maximum range speed) have a mean around 100 kg (3%). It is also concluded that fuel inefficiencies in the vertical and horizontal trajectory domains have a similar contribution to the overall flight inefficiency. Yet, horizontal inefficiencies are higher at strategic level, while are negative at tactical level for the great majority of flights.

[1]  Nicolas Durand,et al.  Learning the aircraft mass and thrust to improve the ground-based trajectory prediction of climbing flights , 2013 .

[2]  M. L. Civita,et al.  A New Method to Validate the Route Extension Metric against Fuel Efficiency , 2015 .

[3]  Luis Delgado European route choice determinants , 2015 .

[4]  Steven Barry,et al.  A Framework for Assessing and Managing the Impact of ANSP Actions on Flight Efficiency , 2015 .

[5]  Rainer Koelle,et al.  Towards a common analysis of vertical flight efficiency , 2016, 2016 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS).

[6]  Gano Broto Chatterji,et al.  Fuel Burn Estimation Using Real Track Data , 2011 .

[8]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[9]  Brian Mac Namee,et al.  Advanced Flight Efficiency Key Performance Indicators to support Air Traffic Analytics: Assessment of European flight efficiency using ADS-B data , 2018, 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[10]  Fedja Netjasov,et al.  APACHE - Review of current KPIs and proposal for new ones , 2017 .

[11]  Ramon Dalmau Codina,et al.  A Fast and Flexible Aircraft Trajectory Predictor and Optimiser for ATM Research Applications , 2018 .

[12]  Vincent Mouillet,et al.  Advanced aircraft performance modeling for ATM: Analysis of BADA model capabilities , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[13]  John Gulding,et al.  Estimating ATM Efficiency Pools in the Descent Phase of Flight Potential Savings in both Time and Fuel , 2011 .