The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing: an evaluation of therapy with and without the use of the periodontal endoscope.

BACKGROUND A fiber-optic periodontal endoscope was developed to aid in the visualization of subgingival structures and to improve the diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of the periodontal endoscope with scaling and root planing (SRP) resulted in a decrease in residual calculus compared to SRP alone. METHODS Fifteen subjects with 50 tooth pairs participated in this study. Each tooth per pair was randomized to receive SRP with or without the endoscope. Teeth were extracted, and a stereomicroscope and digital image analysis was used to determine percent residual calculus present in a masked fashion. RESULTS There was 2.14% (P < 0.001) more residual calculus at control versus test sites. At buccal/lingual and interproximal surfaces, mean differences in residual calculus were 1.30% (P <0.015) and 2.93% (P < 0.001), respectively. Test treatment time decreased significantly as operator experience increased. There were no statistically significant differences between residual calculus for test and control teeth at shallower probing depths; however, at deeper probing depths, the use of the endoscope resulted in significantly less residual calculus. CONCLUSIONS The use of the periodontal endoscope resulted in a statistically significant overall improvement in calculus removal during SRP, which was most evident in deeper probing depths. The clinical significance of this level of improvement is unknown.

[1]  J. Pratten,et al.  Study of bacterial viability within human supragingival dental calculus. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[2]  S. Offenbacher,et al.  Clinical and inflammatory evaluation of Perioscopy on patients with chronic periodontitis. , 2004, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[3]  W. Schwarzwäller,et al.  Subantroscopic laterobasal sinus floor augmentation (SALSA): an up-to-5-year clinical study. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  W. Engelke In situ examination of implant sites with support immersion endoscopy. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  H. Greenwell Position paper: Guidelines for periodontal therapy. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  J. Bahcall,et al.  Fiberoptic endoscope usage for intracanal visualization. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  J. Wiltfang,et al.  Endoscopic and ultrasonographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus after combined sinus floor augmentation and implant insertion. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  D. W. Wells,et al.  Endoscope--an endodontic application. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  F. Carls,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of TMJ arthroscopy in correlation to histological findings. , 1995, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[10]  B. Mealey,et al.  The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth. , 1993, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  R. Arnold,et al.  New clinical diagnostic strategies based on pathogenesis of disease. , 1993, Journal of periodontal research.

[12]  E. Corbet,et al.  The periodontally-involved root surface. , 1993, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  S. Socransky,et al.  The Bacterial Etiology of Destructive Periodontal Disease: Current Concepts. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  G. Greenstein Periodontal response to mechanical non-surgical therapy: a review. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  J. Rapley,et al.  Mechanical and chemical root preparation in vitro: efficiency of plaque and calculus removal. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[16]  H. Löe,et al.  The natural history and clinical course of calculus formation in man. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  P. R. Sherman,et al.  The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing. II. Clinical responses related to residual calculus. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  P. R. Sherman,et al.  The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planning. I. Clinical detection of residual calculus. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Scaling and root planing efficacy in multirooted teeth. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Scaling and root planing effectiveness: the effect of root surface access and operator experience. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  R. Caffesse,et al.  Scaling and root planing with and without periodontal flap surgery. , 1986, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[22]  T J O'Leary,et al.  The impact of research on scaling and root planing. , 1986, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  R. Davies,et al.  The removal of root surface deposits. , 1985, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  M. Ash,et al.  The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing in calculus removal. , 1981, Journal of periodontology.

[25]  T J O'Leary,et al.  The effectiveness of in vivo root planing in removing bacterial endotoxin from the roots of periodontally involved teeth. , 1978, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  J. S. Garrett Root planing: a perspective. , 1977, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  Schroeder He,et al.  Pathogenesis of inflammatory periodontal disease. A summary of current work. , 1976 .

[28]  J J Aleo,et al.  The presence and biologic activity of cementum-bound endotoxin. , 1974, The Journal of Periodontology.

[29]  D. A. Kerr,et al.  TISSUE RESPONSE IN THE GUINEA PIG TO STERILE AND NON-STERILE CALCULUS. , 1965, The Journal of periodontology.