PT Anywhere: a mobile environment for practical learning of network engineering

ABSTRACT The main challenges commonly associated with acquiring practical network engineering skills are the requirements for access to specialised and up-to-date network equipment, as well as the high costs associated with obtaining and maintaining this equipment. The PT Anywhere initiative addresses these challenges by offering a mobile environment for acquiring practical knowledge and skills of network engineering. PT Anywhere facilitates learner-centred anywhere/anytime learning and offers learners access to high-quality interactive learning resources. Additionally, PT Anywhere employs Learning Analytics in order to help learners and educators in understanding and improving learning. This paper presents the learning design and software design principles driving the development of PT Anywhere, as well as the outcomes of an evaluation session conducted with members of the Cisco Networking Academy. The results of this evaluation indicate that PT Anywhere holds the potential to engage learners in different ways inside and outside of the classroom, without the need for access to specialised equipment.

[1]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[2]  Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology , 1990 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[4]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Daniel E. Atkins and John Seely Brown and Allen L. Hammond,et al.  A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities , 2007 .

[6]  Dennis C. Frezzo,et al.  Using activity theory to understand the role of a simulation-based interactive learning environment in a computer networking course , 2009 .

[7]  W. Makasiranondh,et al.  Pedagogical evaluation of simulation tools usage in Network Technology Education , 2010 .

[8]  Andrew Smith,et al.  Delivery of CCNA as part of a distance degree programme , 2010 .

[9]  Kristen E. DiCerbo,et al.  Individual Practice and Collaborative Inquiry: Instructional Configurations in a Simulation Environment , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Networking and Services.

[10]  Andy Johnson,et al.  The Next Generation of SCORM: Innovation for the Global Force , 2012 .

[11]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[12]  George Siemens,et al.  Learning analytics: envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice , 2012, LAK.

[13]  Hang Yin,et al.  Comparison between physical devices and simulator software for Cisco network technology teaching , 2013, 2013 8th International Conference on Computer Science & Education.

[14]  Ranjan Bose.  Virtual Labs Project: A Paradigm Shift in Internet-Based Remote Experimentation , 2013, IEEE Access.

[15]  Daniel Kruse,et al.  Virtual Labs and Remote Labs: Practical experience for everyone , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[16]  Alexander Mikroyannidis,et al.  Online learning and experimentation via interactive learning resources , 2015, 2015 3rd Experiment International Conference (exp.at'15).

[17]  Luiz A. DaSilva,et al.  Virtualizing testbed resources to enable remote experimentation in online telecommunications education , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[18]  Tobias Meisen,et al.  Enhancing the Learning Success of Engineering Students by Virtual Experiments , 2015, HCI.

[19]  Christos Tranoris,et al.  Forging Online Education through FIRE , 2015 .

[20]  John Domingue,et al.  Applying a methodology for the design, delivery and evaluation of learning resources for remote experimentation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[21]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Using Learning Analytics at School: a Go-Lab Study , 2016 .

[22]  Te-Shun Chou,et al.  A Comparison of Network Simulation and Emulation Virtualization Tools , 2016 .

[23]  Jennifer Shewmaker,et al.  Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Rebecca Ferguson.  Learning analytics: a firm basis for the future , 2017 .

[25]  Bart Rienties,et al.  Implementing a Learning Analytics Intervention and Evaluation Framework: what works? , 2017 .

[26]  Muneera Bano,et al.  Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Bart Rienties,et al.  Linking students' timing of engagement to learning design and academic performance , 2018, LAK.

[28]  Feng Xiao,et al.  A Comparison between the Use of Cisco Packet Tracer and Graphical Network Simulator 3 as Learning Media on Students’ Achievement , 2018 .

[29]  Helen Crompton,et al.  Learning With Mobile Devices , 2019, Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Modern Education Delivery.