Culture-Free or Culture-Bound? A Boundary Spanning Perspective on Learning in Knowledge Management Systems

Knowledge management systems (KMSs) have been criticized as having a North American bias. The cultural dimension of KMSs, particularly the relationship of learning and culture in KM projects, are rarely discussed. This paper addresses these concerns in a review of the conceptual foundations for KM and by examining implementations of KM projects. Despite the evolutionary changes in how KM is viewed, KMSs, as they have been designed, implemented, and reported, do not appear to provide for cultural diversity among users. Instead, the reports of KMSs indicate that such systems seek to create and maintain a homogeneous organizational culture, and the adoption of such a shared culture appears to be a prerequisite for success. The paper discusses KMSs as systems that exhibit boundary spanning objects and processes in three different categories, and an analysis of reported projects reveals that boundary spanning across national and ethnic boundaries is rare.

[1]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[2]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Knowledge Mangement in Pursuit of Performance: Insights from Nortel Networks , 2002, MIS Q..

[3]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[4]  D. Kiron,et al.  Managing Knowledge and Learning at NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) , 2002 .

[5]  Rainer Alt,et al.  Implementing Virtual Organizing in Business Networks - A Method for inter-Business Networking , 2000 .

[6]  Mary Bradley,et al.  Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know , 2000 .

[7]  R. Verganti.  Leveraging on systemic learning to manage the early phases of product innovation projects , 1997 .

[8]  P. Earley,et al.  Culture, self-identity, and work , 1993 .

[9]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[10]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[12]  A. MacCormack,et al.  Siemens ShareNet: Building a Knowledge Network , 2002 .

[13]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation , 1989 .

[14]  A. Hilliard.  Behavioral Style, Culture, and Teaching and Learning , 1992 .

[15]  C. Kimble,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Innovation Through Communities of Practice , 2003 .

[16]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[17]  J. Zull.  The art of changing the brain : enriching teaching by exploring the biology of learning , 2002 .

[18]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[19]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[20]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after , 1995 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[22]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[23]  A. Kozulin.  Psychological Tools: A Sociocultural Approach to Education , 1998 .

[24]  Christine W. Soo,et al.  Knowledge Management: Philosophy, Processes, and Pitfalls , 2002 .

[25]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[26]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[27]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[28]  Benjamin Frost,et al.  Viable Communities within Organizational Contexts: Creating and Sustaining Viability in Communities of Practice at Siemens AG , 2004 .

[29]  N. Minick,et al.  Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children's Development , 1993 .

[30]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Process Knowledge Management in New Product Development Teams , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[32]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[33]  Roger Jones,et al.  Changing face of medical curricula , 2001, The Lancet.

[34]  S. Klein,et al.  Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning , 2014 .

[35]  David Boud,et al.  The Challenge of Problem Based Learning , 1991 .

[36]  Stephen Hill,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm , 1981 .

[37]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[38]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[39]  M. Cole,et al.  The cultural context of learning and thinking. An Exploration in Experimental Anthropology. , 1971 .

[40]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Note on Knowledge Management, A , 1997 .

[41]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems , 1994, CACM.

[42]  M. Maurice.  Introduction: Theoretical and Ideological Aspects of the Universalistic Approach to the Study of Organizations , 1976 .

[43]  E. Hall.  The Silent Language , 1959 .

[44]  Jean-Noël Ezingeard,et al.  Knowledge management at Ernst & Young UK: getting value through knowledge flows , 2000, ICIS.

[45]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[46]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[47]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[48]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Ross L Chapman,et al.  Complexity and learning behaviors in product innovation , 2004 .

[50]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Exploiting the virtual value chain , 1999 .

[51]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Coming of the New Organization , 2001 .

[52]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[53]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions , 2002, MIS Q..

[54]  A. Madhok.  Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production , 2002 .

[55]  E. Bridges,et al.  Wisdom gained, wisdom given: instituting PBL in a Chinese culture , 1996 .

[56]  G. A. Miller.  Meta-analysis and the Culture-free Hypothesis , 1987 .

[57]  DoughertyDeborah.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[58]  N. Dixon.  The Organizational Learning Cycle: How We Can Learn Collectively , 1994 .

[59]  Pam Rooney,et al.  Designing a Problem-Based Learning Environment for ESL Students in Business Communication , 1998 .

[60]  Robert R. Mowrer,et al.  Contemporary Learning Theories , 1989 .

[61]  Philip H. Birnbaum,et al.  Organizational Structure of Multinational Banks in Hong Kong from a Culture-Free Perspective. , 1985 .

[62]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[63]  S. Klein,et al.  Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory , 1991 .