Beyond linearity in neuroimaging: Capturing nonlinear relationships with application to longitudinal studies

The ubiquitous adoption of linearity for quantitative predictors in statistical modeling is likely attributable to its advantages of straightforward interpretation and computational feasibility. The linearity assumption may be a reasonable approximation especially when the variable is confined within a narrow range, but it can be problematic when the variable’s effect is non-monotonic or complex. Furthermore, visualization and model assessment of a linear fit are usually omitted because of challenges at the whole brain level in neuroimaging. By adopting a principle of learning from the data in the presence of uncertainty to resolve the problematic aspects of conventional polynomial fitting, we introduce a flexible and adaptive approach of multilevel smoothing splines (MSS) to capture any nonlinearity of a quantitative predictor for population-level neuroimaging data analysis. With no prior knowledge regarding the underlying relationship other than a parsimonious assumption about the extent of smoothness (e.g., no sharp corners), we express the unknown relationship with a sufficient number of smoothing splines and use the data to adaptively determine the specifics of the nonlinearity. In addition to introducing the theoretical framework of MSS as an efficient approach with a counterbalance between flexibility and stability, we strive to (a) lay out the specific schemes for population-level nonlinear analyses that may involve task (e.g., contrasting conditions) and subject-grouping (e.g., patients vs controls) factors; (b) provide modeling accommodations to adaptively reveal, estimate and compare any nonlinear effects of a predictor across the brain, or to more accurately account for the effects (including nonlinear effects) of a quantitative confound; (c) offer the associated program 3dMSS to the neuroimaging community for whole-brain voxel-wise analysis as part of the AFNI suite; and (d) demonstrate the modeling approach and visualization processes with a longitudinal dataset of structural MRI scans.

[1]  Ellen Leibenluft,et al.  Applications of multivariate modeling to neuroimaging group analysis: A comprehensive alternative to univariate general linear model , 2014, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 1986 .

[3]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Jean Duchon,et al.  Splines minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces , 1976, Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables.

[5]  Karen F. Berman,et al.  The NIMH Intramural Longitudinal Study of the Endocrine and Neurobiological Events Accompanying Puberty: Protocol and rationale for methods and measures , 2021, NeuroImage.

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  A. Pirotte,et al.  To Pool or Not to Pool , 2008 .

[8]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[9]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[10]  Klaus P. Ebmeier,et al.  Meta-analysis of generalized additive models in neuroimaging studies , 2020, NeuroImage.

[11]  Paul A. Taylor,et al.  Fighting or embracing multiplicity in neuroimaging? neighborhood leverage versus global calibration , 2019, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Dale,et al.  Critical ages in the life course of the adult brain: nonlinear subcortical aging , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[13]  Gang Chen,et al.  Detecting the subtle shape differences in hemodynamic responses at the group level , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[14]  Alan Y. Chiang,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R , 2007, Technometrics.

[15]  Gilbert Saporta,et al.  L'analyse des données , 1981 .

[16]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Multisensory Activation of the Intraparietal Area When Classifying Grating Orientation: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Hans-Georg Müller Functional Data Analysis. , 2011 .

[18]  Michael D. Gregory,et al.  Williams syndrome hemideletion and LIMK1 variation both affect dorsal stream functional connectivity. , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[20]  Martyn McFarquhar,et al.  Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  Robert J Zatorre,et al.  Asymmetries of the planum temporale and Heschl's gyrus: relationship to language lateralization. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Gang Chen,et al.  Handling Multiplicity in Neuroimaging Through Bayesian Lenses with Multilevel Modeling , 2017, Neuroinformatics.

[23]  Guido Imbens,et al.  Why High-Order Polynomials Should Not Be Used in Regression Discontinuity Designs , 2014 .

[24]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Brain Development Includes Linear and Multiple Nonlinear Trajectories: A Cross-Sectional Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2019, Brain Connect..

[25]  X. Bay,et al.  Generalization of the Kimeldorf-Wahba correspondence for constrained interpolation , 2016, 1602.02714.

[26]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Harmonization of large MRI datasets for the analysis of brain imaging patterns throughout the lifespan , 2019, NeuroImage.

[27]  Gerard R. Ridgway,et al.  Symmetric Diffeomorphic Modeling of Longitudinal Structural MRI , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[28]  Gang Chen,et al.  To pool or not to pool: Can we ignore cross-trial variability in FMRI? , 2021, NeuroImage.

[29]  S. Wood Thin plate regression splines , 2003 .

[30]  Karolinska Schizophrenia Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17,141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA consortium , 2018 .

[31]  Eva H. Telzer,et al.  Methodological considerations for developmental longitudinal fMRI research , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[33]  Paul A Taylor,et al.  An integrative Bayesian approach to matrix‐based analysis in neuroimaging , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Submission PDF Mapping Cortical Brain Asymmetry in 17 , 141 Healthy Individuals Worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium , 2018 .

[35]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .