A randomized trial to study the effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milking performance, teat condition, and udder health.

The objectives were to study the effect of 2 different automatic cluster remover settings on (1) milking characteristics, (2) milk component yields, (3) teat tissue condition, and (4) udder health. In a randomized controlled field trial, Holstein cows (n = 689) from 1 commercial dairy farm with a thrice-daily milking schedule were allocated to 2 treatment groups. Treatment consisted of a cluster remover take-off milk flow threshold of 1.2 (ACR1.2) or 0.8 kg/min (ACR0.8) for 57 d. Milking characteristics (milk yield; and milking unit-on time, MUOT) were obtained with electronic on-farm milk meters. Composite milk samples were collected and analyzed for fat, protein, lactose, and somatic cell count. Machine-milking-induced short- and long-term changes to the teat tissue condition were assessed visually. General linear mixed models demonstrated differences in MUOT, whereas no meaningful differences in milk yield were detected. Milk yield (least squares means, 95% confidence interval) was 11.3 (10.9-11.8) and 11.3 (10.8-11.8) kg in groups ACR1.2 and ACR0.8, respectively. The effect of treatment on MUOT was modified by parity. Milking unit-on time in first-, second-, and ≥third-lactation cows, respectively, was 260.7 (252.0-269.4), 257.8 (247.4-268.1), and 260.2 (252.6-267.9) s in group ACR1.2; and 273.7 (264.9-282.5), 279.1 (269.4-288.8), and 295.7 (287.9-303.6) s in group ACR0.8. We detected no meaningful differences in milk component yields or linear somatic cell score. Least squares means in groups ACR1.2 and ACR0.8, respectively, were milk fat yield, 0.42 (0.40-0.44) and 0.42 (0.40-0.44) kg; milk protein yield, 0.36 (0.35-0.37) and 0.37 (0.36-0.37) kg; milk lactose yield, 0.61 (0.60-0.63) and 0.63 (0.61-0.64) kg, and linear somatic cell score, 1.9 (1.8-2.0) and 1.9 (1.8-2.0). A generalized linear mixed model revealed an effect of treatment on machine-milking-induced short-term changes. The odds of short-term changes to the teat tissue were lower for cows in group ACR1.2 [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 0.78 (0.63-0.96)]. No meaningful differences were detected in machine-milking-induced long-term changes between treatment groups. Increasing cluster remover take-off milk flow threshold from 0.8 to 1.2 kg/min decreased individual milking duration and alleviated machine-milking-induced short-term changes to the teat tissue without adversely affecting milking performance or somatic cell count. Future studies are warranted to investigate the effect on milk production and udder health over a whole lactation period.

[1]  J. Upton,et al.  Effect of teatcup removal settings on milking efficiency and milk quality in a pasture-based automatic milking system. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  R. Erskine,et al.  Decreased milk yield is associated with delayed milk ejection. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  Machine milking-induced changes in teat canal dimensions as assessed by ultrasonography. , 2019, Journal of Dairy Science.

[4]  D. Nydam,et al.  A longitudinal prospective cohort study investigating the association of premilking stimulation and teat-end shape on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition in dairy cows , 2019, BMC Veterinary Research.

[5]  P. Krawczel,et al.  Increased take-off level in automatic milking systems – effects on milk flow, milk yield and milking efficiency at the quarter level , 2018, Journal of Dairy Research.

[6]  D. Nydam,et al.  Short communication: Teat-end shape and udder-level milking characteristics and their associations with machine milking-induced changes in teat tissue condition. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  D. Nydam,et al.  A longitudinal field study investigating the association between teat-end shape and two minute milk yield, milking unit-on time, and time in low flow rate , 2017 .

[8]  R. Black,et al.  Milking time and risk of over-milking can be decreased with early teat cup removal based on udder quarter milk flow without loss in milk yield. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  J. Pickova,et al.  Effects of automatic cluster removal and feeding during milking on milking efficiency, milk yield and milk fat quality , 2016, Journal of Dairy Research.

[10]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  D. Nydam,et al.  Dry period plane of energy: Effects on feed intake, energy balance, milk production, and composition in transition dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. Jago,et al.  Overmilking causes deterioration in teat-end condition of dairy cows in late lactation. , 2013, The Journal of dairy research.

[13]  J. Jago,et al.  Milking efficiency for grazing dairy cows can be improved by increasing automatic cluster remover thresholds without applying premilking stimulation. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  J. Jago,et al.  Short-term application of prestimulation and increased automatic cluster remover threshold affect milking characteristics of grazing dairy cows in late lactation. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  J. Jago,et al.  Comparing somatic cell counts, production and milking durations of dairy cows when milked at two automatic cup-removal flow-rate thresholds , 2011 .

[16]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  J. Jago,et al.  Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  M. Zucali,et al.  Interactions of vacuum, b-phase duration, and liner compression on milk flow rates in dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  M. Hannah,et al.  Incomplete milking has no detectable effect on somatic cell count but increased cell count appears to increase strip yield , 2008 .

[20]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[21]  L. Bava,et al.  Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of a field study. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  V. Tančin,et al.  Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  A. Heinrichs,et al.  Economic returns to Holstein and Jersey herds under multiple component pricing. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  R. Kensinger,et al.  Automatic cluster remover setting affects milk yield and machine-on time in dairy cows. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  M. Hannah,et al.  Milking regimes to shorten milking duration , 2004, Journal of Dairy Research.

[26]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Fractionized milk composition during removal of colostrum and mature milk. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  R. Erskine,et al.  Mastitis therapy and pharmacology. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[28]  S. Godden,et al.  Effects of automatic cluster remover settings on average milking duration, milk flow, and milk yield. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  J. W. Pankey,et al.  Effect of over-milking on teat condition , 2002, Journal of Dairy Research.

[30]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Milk ejection in dairy cows at different degrees of udder filling , 2001, Journal of Dairy Research.

[32]  J. Hillerton,et al.  Changes in cow teat tissue created by two types of milking cluster , 2000, Journal of Dairy Research.

[33]  P. Moroni,et al.  Field study on the relationship between teat thickness changes and intramammary infections , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.

[34]  M. Rasmussen Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health , 1993, Journal of Dairy Research.

[35]  J. Hamann,et al.  Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  G. Shook,et al.  An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. , 1980 .

[37]  I. Baryshnikov Machine milking and mastitis. , 1970 .

[38]  Whittlestone Wg,et al.  Machine milking and Mastitis , 1969 .