"It's a Double-Edged Sword, This Technology Business": Secondary English Teachers' Perspectives on a Schoolwide Laptop Technology Initiative

centered learning and critical thinking in collaborative classrooms. Most seconda?y English teachers in this study did not reject technology per se; rather, they saw some benefits of laptop technology in English instruction. Unfortunately, however, when asked to describe their overall experiences and attitudes toward technology, these teachers revealed a great deal of ambivalence about it in their instruction, especially in the context of a schoolwide laptop technology initiative. Four larger clusters of conflict contributed to this ambivalence: (1) conflicts surrounding institutional control in implementing the laptop program and teacher agency; (2) conflicts surrounding standardized testing's uncertain relationship with technology mandates; (3) conflicts surrounding technology uses in the general curriculum and technology allocation in specific class types; and (4) conflicts surrounding professional identity and the challenges that both student and teacher technology use brought to this identity. The study concludes that these teachers needed to be given greater agency in planning and implementing the laptop technology initiative and in revising their curriculum to embrace this new technology, and the necessary professional development to prepare them for such an educational innovation.

[1]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Tom Healy.  Notebook Programs Pave the Way to Student-Centered Learning , 1999 .

[3]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 2002 .

[4]  M. Fullan.  The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[5]  Gary Barkhuizen.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (2nd Edition) [Book Review] , 2008 .

[6]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[7]  Jay R. Dee,et al.  Support for Innovation in Site-Based-Managed Schools: Developing a Climate for Change , 2002 .

[8]  S. Sarason,et al.  Barometers of Change: Individual, Educational, and Social Transformation , 1996 .

[9]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Computers Meet Classroom: Classroom Wins , 1993, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[10]  Ian Putt,et al.  Teachers' thinking elicited from interactive multimedia professional development courseware , 1996 .

[11]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Design for Adoption: The Development of an Integrated Web-Based Education Environment , 1998 .

[12]  Rachel A. Karchmer.  The Journey Ahead: Thirteen Teachers Report How the Internet Influences Literacy and Literacy Instruction in Their K‐12 Classrooms , 2001 .

[13]  Lisa Abrams,et al.  Instructional Uses of Computers for Writing: The Effect of State Testing Programs , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[14]  D. Caulley.  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , 2007 .

[15]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Roles for New Technologies in Language Arts: Inquiry, Communication, Construction, and Expression , 2003 .

[16]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Techno-Promoter Dreams, Student Realities , 2002 .

[17]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Thrust into Technology: How Veteran Teachers Respond , 2001 .

[18]  Judy M. Parr.  Extending Educational Computing , 1999 .

[19]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[20]  Dennis E Baron,et al.  From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technologies , 1999 .

[21]  Larry Cuban.  Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[22]  Judi Harris.  Teachers as Telecollaborative Project Designers: A Curriculum-Based Approach , 2001 .

[23]  Elizabeth A. Baker.  The nature of literacy in a technology‐rich, fourth‐grade classroom , 2001 .

[24]  T. Popkewitz.  The Denial of Change in Educational Change: Systems of Ideas in the Construction of National Policy and Evaluation , 2000 .

[25]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[26]  David Rideout.  Laptops on the Range , 2002 .

[27]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[28]  Shelley B. Wepner,et al.  From Master Teacher to Master Novice: Shifting Responsibilities in Technology-Infused Classrooms , 2002 .

[29]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[30]  Skee Smith,et al.  The U.S. Department of Education. , 1979 .

[31]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Critical Issues Literacy Technologies: What Stance Should We Take? , 1997 .

[32]  M. Fullan.  Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[33]  Jackie Gottfried,et al.  Learning All over the Place: Integrating Laptop Computers into the Classroom. , 1998 .

[34]  Barrie R. C. Barrell.  Technology and Change in Atlantic Canada's New Secondary English Language Arts Curriculum ^_^_ , 1999 .

[35]  Marcia W. Keyser,et al.  Active learning and cooperative learning: understanding the difference and using both styles effectively , 2000 .

[36]  Jr. Donald J. Leu.  The New Literacies: Research on Reading Instruction With the Internet , 2002 .

[37]  Ken Stevenson.  Learning by Laptop. , 1999 .

[38]  Irma Zardoya.  Urban Students Cross the Digital Divide through Laptop Leasing Program , 2001 .

[39]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[40]  Ewa McGrail.  Laptop Technology and ELA Instruction: High School Teachers’ Perspectives on Benefits and Challenges , 2004 .

[41]  W. Blanton,et al.  The Rhetoric of Whole Language. , 1994 .

[42]  K. Sahl,et al.  Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture , 2002 .