Different contexts for the statistical use of administrative data

The project MIAD of the Statistical Network aims at developing methodologies for an integrated use of administrative data (AD) in the statistical process. MIAD main target is providing guidelines for exploiting AD for statistical purposes. In particular, a quality framework has been developed, a mapping of possible uses has been provided and a schema of alternative informative contexts is proposed. This paper focuses on this latter aspect. In particular, we distinguish between dimensions that relate to features of the source connected with accessibility and with characteristics that are connected to the AD structure and their relationships with the statistical concepts. We denote the first class of features the framework for access and the second class of features the data framework. In this paper we mainly concentrate on the second class of characteristics that are related specifically with the kind of information that can be obtained from the secondary source. In particular, these features relate to the target administrative population and measurement on this population and how it is (or may be) connected with the target population and target statistical concepts.

[1]  Ray Chambers,et al.  Regression Analysis of Probability-Linked Data , 2009 .

[2]  P. Ivax,et al.  A THEORY FOR RECORD LINKAGE , 2004 .

[3]  Erik Meijer,et al.  Measurement Error in Earnings Data: Using a Mixture Model Approach to Combine Survey and Register Data , 2012, Journal of business & economic statistics : a publication of the American Statistical Association.

[4]  Bart F.M. Bakker Micro-integration. State of the art , 2011 .

[5]  Bart F.M. Bakker,et al.  Estimating the validity of administrative variables , 2012 .

[6]  Ivan P. Fellegi,et al.  A Theory for Record Linkage , 1969 .

[7]  Tiziana Tuoto,et al.  Coverage Evaluation on Probabilistically Linked Data , 2015 .

[8]  S. Scholtus Estimating the validity of administrative and survey variables by means of structural equation models , 2013 .

[9]  Paolo Righi,et al.  Generalized framework for defining the optimal inclusion probabilities of one-stage sampling designs for multivariate and multi-domain surveys , 2015 .

[10]  Sander Scholtus,et al.  Modelling measurement error to estimate bias in administrative and survey variables , 2015 .

[11]  Li-Chun Zhang,et al.  Topics of statistical theory for register‐based statistics and data integration , 2012 .

[12]  Li-Chun Zhang A unit-error theory for register-based household statistics , 2011 .

[13]  J. N. K. Rao,et al.  Combining data from two independent surveys: a model-assisted approach , 2012 .

[14]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  Measuring temporary employment. Do survey or register data tell the truth , 2015 .

[15]  Anders Wallgren,et al.  Register-based Statistics: Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes , 2007 .