Comparison of different standards for real-time PCR-based absolute quantification.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is a powerful tool used for both research and diagnostic, which has the advantage, compared to relative quantification, of providing an absolute copy number for a particular target. However, reliable standards are essential for qPCR. In this study, we have compared four types of commonly-used standards--PCR products (with and without purification) and cloned target sequences (circular and linear plasmid) for their stability during storage (using percentage of variance in copy numbers, PCR efficiency and regression curve correlation coefficient (R(2))) using hydrolysis probe (TaqMan) chemistry. Results, expressed as copy numbers/microl, are presented from a sample human system in which absolute levels of HuPO (reference gene) and the cytokine gene IFN-gamma were measured. To ensure the suitability and stability of the four standards, the experiments were performed at 0, 7 and 14 day intervals and repeated 6 times. We have found that the copy numbers vary (due to degradation of standards) over the period of time during storage at 4 degrees C and -20 degrees C, which affected PCR efficiency significantly. The cloned target sequences were noticeably more stable than the PCR product, which could lead to substantial variance in results using standards constructed by different routes. Standard quality and stability should be routinely tested for assays using qPCR.

[1]  Ding Li,et al.  Absolute Quantification of Plasmid DNA by Real-time PCR with Genomic DNA as External Standard and Its Application to a Biodistribution Study of an HIV DNA Vaccine , 2009, Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry.

[2]  B. Molini,et al.  Quantitation of rabbit cytokine mRNA by real-time RT-PCR. , 2007, Cytokine.

[3]  L. Griffiths,et al.  The measurement of adenosine and estrogen receptor expression in rat brains following ovariectomy using quantitative PCR analysis. , 2003, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[4]  F. Chew,et al.  Absolute quantification of gene expression in biomaterials research using real-time PCR. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[5]  Alimuddin Zumla,et al.  Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR , 2004 .

[6]  Jaai Kim,et al.  Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[7]  B. Irvine,et al.  Preparation and characterization of RNA standards for use in quantitative branched DNA hybridization assays. , 1995, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  S A Bustin,et al.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. , 2002, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[9]  L. Overbergh,et al.  Quantification of murine cytokine mRNAs using real time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. , 1999, Cytokine.

[10]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[11]  R. Rutledge,et al.  Mathematics of quantitative kinetic PCR and the application of standard curves. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  M. Whelan,et al.  A method for the absolute quantification of cDNA using real-time PCR. , 2003, Journal of immunological methods.

[13]  B. Decallonne,et al.  An overview of real-time quantitative PCR: applications to quantify cytokine gene expression. , 2001, Methods.

[14]  Jaai Kim,et al.  Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  T. Gibler,et al.  Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction diagnosis of infectious posterior uveitis. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.