Using Competition to Control Congestion in Autonomous Drone Systems

With the number and variety of commercial drones and UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) set to escalate, there will be high future demands on popular regions of airspace and communication bandwidths. This raises safety concerns and hence heightens the need for a generic quantitative understanding of the real-time dynamics of multi-drone populations. Here, we explain how a simple system design built around system-level competition, as opposed to cooperation, can be used to control and ultimately reduce the fluctuations that ordinarily arise in such congestion situations, while simultaneously keeping the on-board processing requirements minimal. These benefits naturally arise from the collective competition to choose the less crowded option, using only previous outcomes and built-in algorithms. We provide explicit closed-form formulae that are applicable to any number of airborne drones N, and which show that the necessary on-board processing increases slower than N as N increases. This design therefore offers operational advantages over traditional cooperative schemes that require drone-to-drone communications that scale like N 2 , and also over optimization and control schemes that do not easily scale up to general N. In addition to populations of drones, the same mathematical analysis can be used to describe more complex individual drones that feature N adaptive sensor/actuator units.

[1]  N. Johnson,et al.  Financial market complexity , 2003 .

[2]  T. A. M. Craven The Radio Spectrum , 1958 .

[3]  Giancarmine Fasano,et al.  Radar/electro-optical data fusion for non-cooperative UAS sense and avoid , 2015 .

[4]  Neil F. Johnson,et al.  Multi-agent complex systems and many-body physics , 2006 .

[5]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones , 2015, Nature.

[6]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Reverse-correlation analysis of navigation dynamics in Drosophila larva using optogenetics , 2015 .

[7]  Kartikeya Bhardwaj,et al.  An Autonomous and Adaptive Bacteria-based Drug Delivery System , 2016, NANOCOM.

[8]  Wei Wu,et al.  Fair energy resource allocation by minority game algorithm for smart buildings , 2012, 2012 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[9]  Henrik Ohlsson,et al.  Incentive Design and Utility Learning via Energy Disaggregation , 2013, 1312.1394.

[10]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Opportunities and challenges with autonomous micro aerial vehicles , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Nicolas Petit,et al.  The Navigation and Control technology inside the AR.Drone micro UAV , 2011 .

[12]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm , 2014, Science.

[13]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[14]  Setareh Maghsudi,et al.  Minority Games With Applications to Distributed Decision Making and Control in Wireless Networks , 2016, IEEE Wireless Communications.