Centralized Time-Dependent Multiple-Carrier Collaboration Problem for Less-Than-Truckload Carriers

This paper addresses a time-dependent, centralized multiple-carrier collaboration problem (TD-MCCP) for the small to medium-sized less-than-truckload (LTL) industry. The TD-MCCP represents a strategy in which a central entity (such as a third-party logistics firm) seeks to minimize the total system costs of an LTL carrier collaborative that consists of multiple carriers by identifying collaborative opportunities over a shared network under three rate-setting behavioral strategies and a leasing alternative. In contrast to conventional time-dependent network problems that view demand as dynamic, capacities in the proposed LTL multiple-carrier collaborative framework are time-dependent but known a priori, and demand is fixed. The TD-MCCP is modeled as a binary (0–1) multi-commodity minimum cost-flow problem formulation for two rate-setting behavioral cases and solved with a branch-and-cut algorithm. The first case examines the effect of one rate-setting behavioral strategy at a time, and the second case examines the effect of multiple rate-setting behavioral strategies simultaneously. Numerical experiments are conducted to seek insights into the computational performance of the TD-MCCP formulations under various network sizes and numbers of shipments. The results indicate that the attractiveness of the time-dependent multiple-carrier collaboration paradigm increases with a volume-oriented rate-setting strategy. Also, a volume-oriented rate strategy has the potential to increase the capacity utilization of carriers seeking to minimize empty-haul trips. Finally, the leasing alternative can serve as a viable option for a centralized collaborative system, especially when affordable collaborative capacity is scarce.

[1]  Özlem Ergun,et al.  Ship Scheduling and Network Design for Cargo Routing in Liner Shipping , 2008, Transp. Sci..

[2]  Rodrigo A. Garrido,et al.  Procurement of transportation services in spot markets under a double-auction scheme with elastic demand , 2007 .

[3]  G D Taylor,et al.  Hub and spoke networks in truckload trucking: configuration, testing and operational concerns , 1995 .

[4]  Abilio Lucena,et al.  Branch and cut algorithms , 1996 .

[5]  Özlem Ergun,et al.  Network Design and Allocation Mechanisms for Carrier Alliances in Liner Shipping , 2010, Oper. Res..

[6]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Multiple user classes real-time traffic assignment for online operations: A rolling horizon solution framework , 1995 .

[7]  J. Mitchell Branch-and-Cut Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems , 1988 .

[8]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Less-than-Truckload Static Single-Carrier Collaboration Problem , 2010 .

[9]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Double-horizon based heuristics for the dynamic pickup and delivery problem with time windows , 2004 .

[10]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1993 .

[11]  R. Kipp Martin,et al.  Large scale linear and integer optimization - a unified approach , 1998 .

[12]  V. Mittal,et al.  Distribution Network Redesign for Marketing Competitiveness , 2009 .

[13]  K. Kawamura,et al.  Commercial Vehicle Value of Time and Perceived Benefit of Congestion Pricing , 1999 .

[14]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Modeling Carrier Behavior in Sequential Auction Transportation Markets , 2003 .

[15]  J A Baker EMERGENT PRICING STRUCTURES IN LTL TRANSPORTATION , 1991 .

[16]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..