Quantitative risk assessment on a gaseous hydrogen refueling station in Shanghai
暂无分享,去创建一个
The potential risk exposure of people for hydrogen refueling stations is often a critical factor to gain authority approval and public acceptance. Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) is often used to quantify the risk around hydrogen facilities and support the communication with authorities during the permitting process. This paper shows a case study on a gaseous hydrogen refueling station using QRA methodology. Risks to station personnel, to refueling customers and to third parties are evaluated respectively. Both individual risk measure and societal risk measure are used in risk assessment. Results show that the compressor leak is the main contributor to risks of all three parties. Elevating compressors can be considered as an effective mitigation measure to reduce occupational risks while setting enclosure around compressors cannot. Both measures are effective to reduce risks to customers. As for third parties, societal risks can be reduced to ALARP region by either elevating compressors or setting enclosure around compressors. External safety distance of compressors cannot be considerably reduced by elevation of compressors, but can significantly be reduced by setting compressor enclosure. However, safety distances of the station are not very sensitive to both mitigation measures.
[1] Pan Xiangmin,et al. Harm effect distances evaluation of severe accidents for gaseous hydrogen refueling station , 2010 .
[2] A. Marangon,et al. Safety distances: Definition and values, , 2007 .
[3] John Andrews,et al. Reliability and Risk Assessment , 1994 .
[4] A.J.C.M. Matthijsen,et al. Safety Distances for Hydrogen Filling Stations , 2006 .