Detection of protein-protein interactions in the live cell plasma membrane by quantifying prey redistribution upon bait micropatterning.

Our understanding of complex biological systems is based on high-quality proteomics tools for the parallelized detection and quantification of protein interactions. Current screening platforms, however, rely on measuring protein interactions in rather artificial systems, rendering the results difficult to confer on the in vivo situation. We describe here a detailed protocol for the design and the construction of a system to detect and quantify interactions between a fluorophore-labeled protein ("prey") and a membrane protein ("bait") in living cells. Cells are plated on micropatterned surfaces functionalized with antibodies to the bait exoplasmic domain. Bait-prey interactions are assayed via the redistribution of the fluorescent prey. The method is characterized by high sensitivity down to the level of single molecules, the capability to detect weak interactions, and high throughput, making it applicable as a screening tool. The proof-of-concept is demonstrated for the interaction between CD4, a major coreceptor in T-cell signaling, and Lck, a protein tyrosine kinase essential for early T-cell signaling.

[1]  Akihiro Kusumi,et al.  Dynamic recruitment of phospholipase Cγ at transiently immobilized GPI-anchored receptor clusters induces IP3–Ca2+ signaling: single-molecule tracking study 2 , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  U. Landegren,et al.  Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation , 2006, Nature Methods.

[3]  D. Legler,et al.  Differential insertion of GPI‐anchored GFPs into lipid rafts of live cells , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[4]  Eric O Long,et al.  Mutations in human CD4 impair the functional interaction with different human and mouse class II isotypes and alleles. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[5]  F. Veronese Peptide and protein PEGylation: a review of problems and solutions. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[6]  Igor Stagljar,et al.  Analysis of membrane protein interactions using yeast-based technologies. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  D. Axelrod Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in cell biology. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[8]  F. Rehfeldt,et al.  Selective deposition of native cell membranes on biocompatible micropatterns. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  P. Schwille,et al.  Dual-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy for multicomponent diffusional analysis in solution. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[10]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[11]  L. Regan,et al.  Antiparallel Leucine Zipper-Directed Protein Reassembly: Application to the Green Fluorescent Protein , 2000 .

[12]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[13]  N. Tinel,et al.  Cell-surface protein-protein interaction analysis with time-resolved FRET and snap-tag technologies: application to GPCR oligomerization , 2008, Nature Methods.

[14]  S. Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean Network Model Predicts Cell Cycle Sequence of Fission Yeast , 2007, PloS one.

[15]  K. Eidne,et al.  Illuminating insights into protein-protein interactions using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[16]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[17]  C. Thiele,et al.  Photo-leucine and photo-methionine allow identification of protein-protein interactions in living cells , 2005, Nature Methods.

[18]  Giulio Superti-Furga,et al.  Charting protein complexes, signaling pathways, and networks in the immune system , 2006, Immunological reviews.

[19]  Natasa Przulj,et al.  High-Throughput Mapping of a Dynamic Signaling Network in Mammalian Cells , 2005, Science.

[20]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[21]  G. Schütz,et al.  3D Mapping of Individual Ion Channels on Living Cells , 2000 .

[22]  Emmanuel Delamarche,et al.  Microcontact Printing of Proteins , 2000 .

[23]  Maïté Coppey-Moisan,et al.  Photoconversion of YFP into a CFP-like species during acceptor photobleaching FRET experiments , 2005, Nature Methods.

[24]  Barbara Baird,et al.  Visualization of plasma membrane compartmentalization with patterned lipid bilayers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  K. Mossman,et al.  Altered TCR Signaling from Geometrically Repatterned Immunological Synapses , 2005, Science.

[26]  Michael Z. Lin,et al.  A drug-controllable tag for visualizing newly synthesized proteins in cells and whole animals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Colin K. Choi,et al.  Stoichiometry of molecular complexes at adhesions in living cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  K. Yeow,et al.  Cellular imaging in drug discovery , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  I. Stagljar,et al.  A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. Gu,et al.  Biochemical visualization of cell surface molecular clustering in living cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Kai Johnsson,et al.  Chemical probes shed light on protein function. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[32]  Peter Ramm,et al.  Image-based screening: a technology in transition. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[33]  G. Schütz,et al.  Single-molecule reader for high-throughput bioanalysis. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  B. Séraphin,et al.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.

[35]  P. Schwille,et al.  Fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy in living cells , 2006, Nature Methods.

[36]  H. Craighead,et al.  Mast Cell Activation on Patterned Lipid Bilayers of Subcellular Dimensions , 2003 .

[37]  Gerhard J Schütz,et al.  Micropatterning for quantitative analysis of protein-protein interactions in living cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[38]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[39]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Reconstruction of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their properties , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  A. Aronheim,et al.  The Ras recruitment system, a novel approach to the study of protein–protein interactions , 1998, Current Biology.

[41]  Stefan Engelhardt,et al.  Analysis of receptor oligomerization by FRAP microscopy , 2009, Nature Methods.

[42]  S. Howorka,et al.  Glass surfaces grafted with high-density poly(ethylene glycol) as substrates for DNA oligonucleotide microarrays. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[43]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[44]  M. Kaltenbrunner,et al.  Reply to “Uncoupling diffusion and binding in FRAP experiments” , 2009, Nature Methods.

[45]  S. Blacklow,et al.  A Zinc Clasp Structure Tethers Lck to T Cell Coreceptors CD4 and CD8 , 2003, Science.

[46]  T. McIntosh,et al.  Roles of bilayer material properties in function and distribution of membrane proteins. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[47]  Chang‐Deng Hu,et al.  Visualization of interactions among bZIP and Rel family proteins in living cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. , 2002, Molecular cell.