Multi-criteria analysis: ignorance or negligence?
暂无分享,去创建一个
Multi-Criteria Analysis is highly subjective and potentially open to abuse through the influence of special interests. Moreover, it is seriously flawed conceptually and mathematically. At best, its continued use by public sector policy advisers and decisionmakers is due to ignorance. At worst, it represents gross negligence in the provision of advice to Ministers, and possibly breaches Australian Public Service Values and the Code of Conduct.
[1] Leo Dobes,et al. Multi-criteria analysis: “Good Enough” for government work? , 2009 .
[2] D. Luskin,et al. FACTS AND FURPHIES IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS: TRANSPORT , 1999 .
[3] Timothy Coelli,et al. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .
[4] Gary Banks,et al. Evidence-Based Policy Making: What is It? How Do We Get It? , 2009, World Scientific Reference on Asia-Pacific Trade Policies.
[5] Henry Ergas. In Defence of Cost-benefit Analysis , 2009 .