Semi-supervised Remote Sensing Image Segmentation Using Dynamic Region Merging

This paper introduces a remote sensing image segmentation approach by using semi-supervised and dynamic region merging. In remote sensing images, the spatial relationship among pixels has been shown to be sparsely represented by a linear combination of a few training samples from a structured dictionary. The sparse vector is recovered by solving a sparsity-constrained optimization problem, and it can directly determine the class label of the test sample. Through a graph-based technique, unlabeled samples are actively selected based on the entropy of the corresponding class label. With an initially segmented image based semi-supervised, in which the many regions to be merged for a meaningful segmentation. By taking the region merging as a labeling problem, image segmentation is performed by iteratively merging the regions according to a statistical test. Experiments on two datasets are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Comparisons with the state-of-the-art methods demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively investigate the spatial relationship among pixels and achieve better remote sensing image segmentation results.

[1]  Gavin C. Cawley,et al.  Sparse Multinomial Logistic Regression via Bayesian L1 Regularisation , 2006, NIPS.

[2]  Yue Gao,et al.  3-D Object Retrieval and Recognition With Hypergraph Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Anne H. Schistad Solberg,et al.  Structured Gaussian Components for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Jong Beom Ra,et al.  Homogeneous region merging approach for image segmentation preserving semantic object contours , 1998 .

[5]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A Composite Semisupervised SVM for Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2009, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Matthieu Guillaumin,et al.  Combining Image-Level and Segment-Level Models for Automatic Annotation , 2012, MMM.

[7]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Frank Nielsen,et al.  Statistical region merging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[10]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Semisupervised Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Using Multinomial Logistic Regression With Active Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Semi-Supervised Graph-Based Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Images With Regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Semi-supervised graph clustering: a kernel approach , 2005, ICML '05.

[14]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Using a New Bayesian Approach With Active Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Imen Karoui,et al.  Unsupervised region-based image segmentation using texture statistics and level-set methods , 2006, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[16]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles , 2008, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[17]  Ye Zhang,et al.  Representative Multiple Kernel Learning for Classification in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Yue Gao,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification by Using Pixel Spatial Correlation , 2013, MMM.

[19]  Cevahir Çigla,et al.  Region-based image segmentation via graph cuts , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.