Automated Identification of Relative Social Status

Understanding the social context is a key requirement for any dialogue system that is able to interact in situations with multiple users, and also improves a dialogue agent’s ability to identify expectations of a single user. This paper focuses on methods for identifying one sub-aspect of the social context, the relative social power between interactors. Specifically, this paper examines how alternative candidate dialogue feature representations affect the ability of different classifiers to predict relative social power. The performance of the classifier and feature representation pairs was compared for the task of determining whether or not two speakers have a difference in social power, for two different transcript data sets. Different feature and classifier combinations performed best at detecting the presence, versus the absence, of a difference in social power.

[1]  W. Labov The social stratification of English in New York City , 1969 .

[2]  G. N. Lance,et al.  Mixed-Data Classificatory Programs I - Agglomerative Systems , 1967, Aust. Comput. J..

[3]  B. Thorne,et al.  Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance , 1975 .

[4]  R. Macaulay,et al.  Language, Social Class, and Education: A Glasgow Study , 1979 .

[5]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  Conversational Shift Work: A Study of Topical Transitions Between Women and Men , 1988 .

[6]  Dominance and deference in conversation , 1989 .

[7]  D. H. Zimmerman,et al.  9. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation , 1996 .

[8]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Towards Flexible Teamwork , 1997, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[9]  Harry Bunt,et al.  The ABC of Computational Pragmatics , 2000, Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue.

[10]  S. Romaine Language and Social Class , 2001 .

[11]  H. Itakura Describing conversational dominance , 2001 .

[12]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System , 2004, NAACL.

[13]  Miriam A. Locher Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements In Oral Communication , 2004 .

[14]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue , 2004 .

[15]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Language and Interpersonal Cognition: Causal Effects of Variations in Pronoun Usage on Perceptions of Closeness , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[16]  Beth Ann Hockey,et al.  A Voice Enabled Procedure Browser for the International Space Station , 2005, ACL.

[17]  David Willer,et al.  From Status to Power: New Models at the Intersection of Two Theories , 2006 .

[18]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  Detection and application of influence rankings in small group meetings , 2006, ICMI '06.

[19]  Shlomo Hershkop,et al.  Automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[20]  A. Duranti Ethnography of Speaking: Toward a Linguistics of the Praxis , 2008 .

[21]  Gökhan Tür,et al.  The CALO meeting speech recognition and understanding system , 2008, 2008 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop.

[22]  David A. Huffaker,et al.  Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities , 2010 .

[23]  Jiye Yu,et al.  Discovery of numerous specific topics via term co-occurrence analysis , 2010, CIKM '10.

[24]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Language Style Matching as a Predictor of Social Dynamics in Small Groups , 2010, Commun. Res..

[25]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[26]  Rafael Alonso,et al.  Extracting Social Power Relationships from Natural Language , 2011, ACL.

[27]  Neil Yorke-Smith,et al.  PTIME: Personalized assistance for calendaring , 2011, TIST.

[28]  Scott Potter,et al.  Learning by Demonstration Technology for Military Planning and Decision Making: A Deployment Story , 2011, IAAI.

[29]  J. Pennebaker The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us , 2011 .

[30]  Karen L. Myers,et al.  The Design of a Proactive Personal Agent for Task Management , 2012, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[31]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction , 2011, WWW.

[32]  Jacob Andreas,et al.  Detecting Influencers in Written Online Conversations , 2012 .

[33]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Modeling topic control to detect influence in conversations using nonparametric topic models , 2014, Machine Learning.

[34]  Owen Rambow,et al.  Written Dialog and Social Power: Manifestations of Different Types of Power in Dialog Behavior , 2013, IJCNLP.

[35]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Theory of Mind in the Mod Game: An Agent-Based Model of Strategic Reasoning , 2014, ECSI.

[36]  Steve J. Young,et al.  Stochastic Language Generation in Dialogue using Factored Language Models , 2014, Computational Linguistics.

[37]  Seungwhan Moon,et al.  Identifying Student Leaders from MOOC Discussion Forums through Language Influence , 2014, EMNLP 2014.

[38]  Matthew Henderson,et al.  The use of discriminative belief tracking in POMDP-based dialogue systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT).

[39]  A. Graesser,et al.  Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies , 2014 .

[40]  Marko Dragojevic,et al.  Communication Accommodation Theory , 2015 .

[41]  Katherine A. Heller,et al.  The Bayesian Echo Chamber: Modeling Social Influence via Linguistic Accommodation , 2015, AISTATS.