Intrinsic and Synaptic Properties Shaping Diverse Behaviors of Neural Dynamics

The majority of neurons in the neuronal system of the brain have a complex morphological structure, which diversifies the dynamics of neurons. In the granular layer of the cerebellum, there exists a unique cell type, the unipolar brush cell (UBC), that serves as an important relay cell for transferring information from outside mossy fibers to downstream granule cells. The distinguishing feature of the UBC is that it has a simple morphology, with only one short dendritic brush connected to its soma. Based on experimental evidence showing that UBCs exhibit a variety of dynamic behaviors, here we develop two simple models, one with a few detailed ion channels for simulation and the other one as a two-variable dynamical system for theoretical analysis, to characterize the intrinsic dynamics of UBCs. The reasonable values of the key channel parameters of the models can be determined by analysis of the stability of the resting membrane potential and the rebound firing properties of UBCs. Considered together with a large variety of synaptic dynamics installed on UBCs, we show that the simple-structured UBCs, as relay cells, can extend the range of dynamics and information from input mossy fibers to granule cells with low-frequency resonance and transfer stereotyped inputs to diverse amplitudes and phases of the output for downstream granule cells. These results suggest that neuronal computation, embedded within intrinsic ion channels and the diverse synaptic properties of single neurons without sophisticated morphology, can shape a large variety of dynamic behaviors to enhance the computational ability of local neuronal circuits.

[1]  Evelyne Sernagor,et al.  Spontaneous Activity in Developing Turtle Retinal Ganglion Cells: Pharmacological Studies , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Egidio D'Angelo,et al.  Computational modeling predicts the ionic mechanism of late-onset responses in unipolar brush cells , 2014, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[3]  Chris I. De Zeeuw,et al.  Variable timing of synaptic transmission in cerebellar unipolar brush cells , 2014 .

[4]  H. Markram,et al.  Differential signaling via the same axon of neocortical pyramidal neurons. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Detwiler,et al.  Different Mechanisms Generate Maintained Activity in ON and OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  N. Barmack,et al.  Functions of Interneurons in Mouse Cerebellum , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  W. Maass,et al.  State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Masao Ito.  Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  R Angus Silver,et al.  The Contribution of Single Synapses to Sensory Representation in Vivo , 2008, Science.

[10]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Neuronal Morphology Generates High-Frequency Firing Resonance , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Y. Yarom,et al.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  P. Strick,et al.  Cerebellum and nonmotor function. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  G. Kinney,et al.  Prolonged physiological entrapment of glutamate in the synaptic cleft of cerebellar unipolar brush cells. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Linden,et al.  Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Gain Change Is Related to Postsynaptic Spike Firing at a Cerebellar Inhibitory Synapse , 1998, Neuron.

[15]  Chris I. De Zeeuw,et al.  Time windows and reverberating loops: a reverse-engineering approach to cerebellar function , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[16]  J. J. Torres,et al.  Temporal discrimination from the interaction between dynamic synapses and intrinsic subthreshold oscillations , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  Jian K. Liu,et al.  Mechanisms and functional roles of glutamatergic synapse diversity in a cerebellar circuit , 2016, eLife.

[18]  Adam Kohn,et al.  Questioning the role of rebound firing in the cerebellum , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Masao Ito.  The Cerebellum: From Structure to Control , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  L. Luo,et al.  Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward , 2017, Nature.

[21]  D. Tank,et al.  Intracellular dynamics of hippocampal place cells during virtual navigation , 2009, Nature.

[22]  Dean V Buonomano,et al.  Embedding Multiple Trajectories in Simulated Recurrent Neural Networks in a Self-Organizing Manner , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Vincenzo Crunelli,et al.  The ‘window’ T‐type calcium current in brain dynamics of different behavioural states , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Arithmetic of Subthreshold Synaptic Summation in a Model CA1 Pyramidal Cell , 2003, Neuron.

[25]  Carolina Borges-Merjane,et al.  ON and OFF Unipolar Brush Cells Transform Multisensory Inputs to the Auditory System , 2015, Neuron.

[26]  N. Slater,et al.  NMDA receptor-mediated currents in rat cerebellar granule and unipolar brush cells. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  N. Slater,et al.  Voltage-dependent calcium signaling in rat cerebellar unipolar brush cells , 2009, Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Perez-Reyes.  Molecular physiology of low-voltage-activated t-type calcium channels. , 2003, Physiological reviews.

[29]  E. Mugnaini,et al.  Distribution of unipolar brush cells and other calretinin immunoreactive components in the mammalian cerebellar cortex , 1999, Journal of neurocytology.

[30]  D. Rossi,et al.  Properties of transmission at a giant glutamatergic synapse in cerebellum: the mossy fiber-unipolar brush cell synapse. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  D Jaarsma,et al.  The unipolar brush cells of the mammalian cerebellum and cochlear nucleus: cytology and microcircuitry. , 1997, Progress in brain research.

[32]  I. Raman,et al.  Potentiation of Mossy Fiber EPSCs in the Cerebellar Nuclei by NMDA Receptor Activation followed by Postinhibitory Rebound Current , 2006, Neuron.

[33]  Yuguo Tang,et al.  MATRIEX imaging: multiarea two-photon real-time in vivo explorer , 2019, Light: Science & Applications.

[34]  W Hamish Mehaffey,et al.  Specific T-type calcium channel isoforms are associated with distinct burst phenotypes in deep cerebellar nuclear neurons. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Andreea C. Bostan,et al.  The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated network , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic computation , 2004, Nature.

[37]  Pablo Varona,et al.  Interplay between Subthreshold Oscillations and Depressing Synapses in Single Neurons , 2016, PloS one.

[38]  Jennifer L Raymond,et al.  Computational Principles of Supervised Learning in the Cerebellum. , 2018, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  Stéphane Dieudonné,et al.  T-Type and L-Type Ca2+ Conductances Define and Encode the Bimodal Firing Pattern of Vestibulocerebellar Unipolar Brush Cells , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Rinzel,et al.  A model of the T-type calcium current and the low-threshold spike in thalamic neurons. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[42]  E. Mugnaini,et al.  Extraordinary synapses of the unipolar brush cell: An electron microscopic study in the rat cerebellum , 1994, Synapse.

[43]  D. Linden,et al.  Regulation of the rebound depolarization and spontaneous firing patterns of deep nuclear neurons in slices of rat cerebellum. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Modeling Single-Neuron Dynamics and Computations: A Balance of Detail and Abstraction , 2006, Science.

[45]  Greg Wayne,et al.  A temporal basis for predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands in an electric fish , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  E. Mugnaini,et al.  Postnatal differentiation of unipolar brush cells and mossy fiber-unipolar brush cell synapses in rat cerebellum , 2001, Neuroscience.

[47]  R. Shigemoto,et al.  Differential expression of calretinin and metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR1α defines subsets of unipolar brush cells in mouse cerebellum , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  Enrico Mugnaini,et al.  The unipolar brush cell: A remarkable neuron finally receiving deserved attention , 2011, Brain Research Reviews.

[49]  C. D. De Zeeuw,et al.  Variable timing of synaptic transmission in cerebellar unipolar brush cells , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Jacqueline N. Crawley,et al.  Autistic-like behavior and cerebellar dysfunction in Purkinje cell Tsc1 mutant mice , 2012, Nature.

[51]  Jian K. Liu,et al.  Learning Rule of Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling: Presynaptic Dependent or Not , 2011, Neural Computation.

[52]  V Taglietti,et al.  Theta-Frequency Bursting and Resonance in Cerebellar Granule Cells: Experimental Evidence and Modeling of a Slow K+-Dependent Mechanism , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Jian K. Liu,et al.  Spike-Triggered Covariance Analysis Reveals Phenomenological Diversity of Contrast Adaptation in the Retina , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  C I De Zeeuw,et al.  Signal processing in the C2 module of the flocculus and its role in head movement control. , 1997, Progress in brain research.

[55]  E. Mugnaini,et al.  Glutamate receptor subunits at mossy fiber‐unipolar brush cell synapses: Light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical study in cerebellar cortex of rat and cat , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  N. Lee,et al.  TBR2-immunopsitive unipolar brush cells are associated with ectopic zebrin II-immunoreactive Purkinje cell clusters in the cerebellum of scrambler mice , 2010, Anatomy & cell biology.