Astro2020 Science White Paper: The Next Decade of Astroinformatics and Astrostatistics

Over the past century, major advances in astronomy and astrophysics have been largely driven by improvements in instrumentation and data collection. With the amassing of high quality data from new telescopes, and especially with the advent of deep and large astronomical surveys, it is becoming clear that future advances will also rely heavily on how those data are analyzed and interpreted. New methodologies derived from advances in statistics, computer science, and machine learning are beginning to be employed in sophisticated investigations that are not only bringing forth new discoveries, but are placing them on a solid footing. Progress in wide-field sky surveys, interferometric imaging, precision cosmology, exoplanet detection and characterization, and many subfields of stellar, Galactic and extragalactic astronomy, has resulted in complex data analysis challenges that must be solved to perform scientific inference. Research in astrostatistics and astroinformatics will be necessary to develop the state-of-the-art methodology needed in astronomy. Overcoming these challenges requires dedicated, interdisciplinary research. We recommend: (1) increasing funding for interdisciplinary projects in astrostatistics and astroinformatics; (2) dedicating space and time at conferences for interdisciplinary research and promotion; (3) developing sustainable funding for long-term astrostatisics appointments; and (4) funding infrastructure development for data archives and archive support, state-of-the-art algorithms, and efficient computing.

[1]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learning , 2018, ArXiv.

[2]  B. Póczos,et al.  A Robust and Efficient Deep Learning Method for Dynamical Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[3]  Virgilio Gómez-Rubio,et al.  Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications with R , 2016 .

[4]  Armin Rest,et al.  Subpercent Photometry: Faint DA White Dwarf Spectrophotometric Standards for Astrophysical Observatories , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[5]  Keith C. Gendreau,et al.  STROBE-X: X-ray Timing and Spectroscopy on Dynamical Timescales from Microseconds to Years , 2017 .

[6]  F. Marinacci,et al.  A Deep Learning Approach to Galaxy Cluster X-Ray Masses , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[7]  Thomas J. Loredo,et al.  Commentary: Bayesian Analysis Across Astronomy , 2012 .

[8]  Levi Fussell,et al.  Forging new worlds: high-resolution synthetic galaxies with chained generative adversarial networks , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[9]  Igor E. Shparlinski,et al.  Bilinear sums of Kloosterman sums, multiplicative congruences and average values of the divisor function over families of arithmetic progressions , 2018, Research in Number Theory.

[10]  Henry C. Ferguson,et al.  Astronomical Data Reduction and Analysis for the Next Decade , 2009 .

[11]  Yuan-Sen Ting,et al.  The Payne: Self-consistent ab initio Fitting of Stellar Spectra , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[12]  Terry D. Oswalt,et al.  Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems , 2013 .

[13]  R. Wolpert,et al.  Improving exoplanet detection power: Multivariate Gaussian process models for stellar activity , 2017, The Annals of Applied Statistics.

[14]  E. Ford,et al.  Quantifying the Bayesian Evidence for a Planet in Radial Velocity Data , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[15]  Akshay Pai,et al.  Deep-learnt classification of light curves , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[16]  David W Hogg.  A likelihood function for the Gaia Data , 2018 .

[17]  Kirk D. Borne,et al.  Astroinformatics: A 21st Century Approach to Astronomy , 2009, ArXiv.

[18]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  WOBBLE: A Data-driven Analysis Technique for Time-series Stellar Spectra , 2019, The Astronomical Journal.

[19]  Prabhat,et al.  Approximate Inference for Constructing Astronomical Catalogs from Images , 2018, The Annals of Applied Statistics.

[20]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps , 2013, ICLR.

[21]  Benjamin D. Johnson,et al.  How to Measure Galaxy Star Formation Histories. II. Nonparametric Models , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[22]  Bence Kocsis,et al.  Localization of binary black hole mergers with known inclination , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[23]  E. Murphy,et al.  Science with a next-generation Very Large Array , 2019 .

[24]  David W. Hogg,et al.  Spectrophotometric Parallaxes with Linear Models: Accurate Distances for Luminous Red-giant Stars , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[25]  Stephen K. N. Portillo,et al.  Photometric Biases in Modern Surveys , 2019, The Astronomical Journal.

[26]  Pennsylvania State University,et al.  Mixture Models in Astronomy , 2017, 1711.11101.

[27]  Wei Chen,et al.  Learning to predict the cosmological structure formation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Kirk D. Borne,et al.  The Revolution in Astronomy Education: Data Science for the Masses , 2009, ArXiv.

[29]  Saharon Shelah.  Research supported by the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation Publication number 515; Latest Revision 02/95 , 1995 .

[30]  N. Sedaghat,et al.  Gaia DR2 unravels incompleteness of nearby cluster population: new open clusters in the direction of Perseus , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[31]  David M. Reiman,et al.  Deblending galaxy superpositions with branched generative adversarial networks , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[32]  Angie Wolfgang,et al.  Predicting Exoplanets Mass and Radius: A Nonparametric Approach , 2018 .