RFID tag acquisition via compressed sensing: flexibility by random signature assignment

Classical Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) schemes such as Frame Slotted ALOHA (FSA) try to avoid colliding tag responses in the acquisition phase. We propose a scheme that exploits collisions in the acquisition phase, which is enabled by compressed sensing techniques. As an extension to previous work, it allows a more flexible usage of the compressed sensing-based approach for RFID. All activated tags randomly select a signature from a huge signature pool and simultaneously transmit it as a response to a query from the reader. The number of superposed signatures at the reader is significantly smaller than the total signature count, which introduces sparsity to the problem. Utilizing compressed sensing recovery, we determine the set of activated tags, which can then be read out and identified. Our formulation allows to use a computationally efficient approximate message passing algorithm for recovery. The tag identification proves to be quicker and more robust to noise compared to FSA, which we show by simulation.

[1]  Martin Mayer,et al.  RFID tag acquisition via compressed sensing , 2014, 2014 IEEE RFID Technology and Applications Conference (RFID-TA).

[2]  David C. Yen,et al.  Taxonomy and survey of RFID anti-collision protocols , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[3]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Asymptotic Analysis of Complex LASSO via Complex Approximate Message Passing (CAMP) , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Robert Langwieser,et al.  Automatic leaking carrier canceller adjustment techniques , 2013, EURASIP J. Embed. Syst..

[6]  Alf Johansson,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Frame-Slotted Aloha , 2011, 2011 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[7]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Efficient and reliable low-power backscatter networks , 2012, CCRV.

[8]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  VLSI Design of Approximate Message Passing for Signal Restoration and Compressive Sensing , 2012, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[9]  Kwan-Wu Chin,et al.  A Survey and Tutorial of RFID Anti-Collision Protocols , 2010, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Mo Li,et al.  P-MTI: Physical-Layer Missing Tag Identification via Compressive Sensing , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[11]  Mary Ann Ingram,et al.  Measurements of small-scale fading and path loss for long range RF tags , 2003 .

[12]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[13]  Robert Langwieser,et al.  RFID Reader Receivers for Physical Layer Collision Recovery , 2010, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[14]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[15]  Xiaocheng Lin,et al.  Collision-based Radio frequency identification using compressive sensing , 2013, 2013 15th IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology.

[16]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  R. DeVore,et al.  A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices , 2008 .

[18]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.