Decay and Interference Effects in Visuospatial Short-Term Memory

The method of constant stimuli was used to examine the accuracy with which two-dimensional spatial information can be represented in mental images. In experiment 1, subjects had to decide which of two successively presented two-dot separations was wider. Over the range of interstimulus intervals employed (0 to 30 s), there was a linear relationship between interstimulus interval and spatial interval thresholds. In experiment 2 subjects' abilities to represent accurately more than one spatial interval at a time was investigated. Three dot pairs were presented, but only two pairs were to be compared, the third being completely irrelevant to the task. This manipulation doubled thresholds (relative to a two-dot-pair control condition), whether or not subjects were obliged to attend to the irrelevant dots. Overall, the results suggest that mental representations of spatial information may be temporally durable, but only in the absence of extraneous stimuli. The latter not only disrupt memory for spatial information, but appear to have obligatory access to it.

[1]  N H Kerr,et al.  Locational representation in imagery: The third dimension , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[2]  P. Meudell,et al.  Short Report: Is Spatial Information Encoded Automatically in Memory? , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Hong Wang,et al.  Spatial integration in position acuity , 1994, Vision Research.

[4]  D. Regan,et al.  Opponent model for line interval discrimination: Interval and vernier performance compared , 1987, Vision Research.

[5]  Karen K. De Valois,et al.  Discrimination of relative spatial position , 1990, Vision Research.

[6]  D M Levi,et al.  Spatial-interval discrimination in the human fovea: what delimits the interval? , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  M. Fahle,et al.  Visual memory for vernier offsets , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  C. A. Burbeck Position and spatial frequency in large-scale localization judgments , 1987, Vision Research.

[9]  H C Dale,et al.  Short-term memory for visual information. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[10]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental imagery acuity in the peripheral visual field. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M J Morgan,et al.  Spatial and spatial-frequency primitives in spatial-interval discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  S. McKee,et al.  Exposure duration affects the sensitivity of vernier acuity to target motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[14]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Perfect visual short-term memory for periodic patterns , 1990 .

[15]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[16]  F. Attneave,et al.  Locational representation in imagery: a moving spot task. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. Frick,et al.  Issues of representation and limited capacity in the visuospatial sketchpad. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[18]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[19]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory , 1991, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Kinchla,et al.  A diffusion model of perceptual memory , 1967 .

[21]  N Morris,et al.  Characteristics of visual interference with visuospatial working memory. , 1994, British journal of psychology.

[22]  R. Finke,et al.  Theories relating mental imagery to perception. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  David R. Badcock,et al.  The sensitivity of separation discrimination to spatiotemporal jitter , 1990, Vision Research.

[24]  M. Farah Is visual imagery really visual? Overlooked evidence from neuropsychology. , 1988, Psychological review.

[25]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Spatial-filter selection in large-scale spatial-interval discrimination , 1990, Vision Research.

[26]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[27]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Integration regions for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[28]  Stephen Michael Kosslyn,et al.  Information representation in visual images , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  M. Morgan,et al.  Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions , 1990, Vision Research.

[30]  M J Morgan,et al.  Evidence for positional coding in hyperacuity. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  R. Shepard,et al.  Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Two mechanisms for localization? Evidence for separation-dependent and separation-independent processing of position information , 1990, Vision Research.

[33]  D. Regan Storage of spatial-frequency information and spatial-frequency discrimination , 1985 .