Performance Analysis of Zigbee Wireless Sensor Networks with Relaying

In wireless sensor networks, transmitting information from sensors to a far access point (AP), out of direct transmission range, might make the use of relaying crucial. The goal of this chapter is to study the impact of relaying in Zigbee wireless sensor networks. In particular, we focus on Zigbee wireless sensor networks and analyze scenarios where the sensors transmit to an AP (or coordinator) (i) directly, (ii) through a relay node (or router), or (iii) through two relays. We study how the network performance (in terms of delay, transmission rate, and throughput) is influenced by the number of sensors, the traffic load, and the use of ACKnowledgment (ACK) messages. This performance analysis is carried out with simulations, analytical considerations, and experimental measurements. Our results show that the use of one or two relays, combined with the use of ACK messages (not efficiently managed by the upper layers of the network protocol stack), may cause a significant performance degradation. On the opposite, if ACK messages are not used, then the performance improves significantly. In addition, we also consider the impact of the network lifetime on the network transmission rate.

[1]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[2]  Taieb Znati,et al.  Novel Techniques for Analysis and Design of Cross-Layer Optimized Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[3]  Chee-Yee Chong,et al.  Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[4]  Gianluigi Ferrari,et al.  Extending the Lifetime of Sensor Networks through Adaptive Reclustering , 2007, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[5]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .

[6]  L. Kleinrock,et al.  Packet Switching in Radio Channels: Part I - Carrier Sense Multiple-Access Modes and Their Throughput-Delay Characteristics , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  Gianluigi Ferrari,et al.  Wireless Sensor Networks: Performance Analysis in Indoor Scenarios , 2007, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[8]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Experimental study of concurrent transmission in wireless sensor networks , 2006, SenSys '06.

[9]  Z. Bradac,et al.  THE ZIGBEE EXPERIENCE , 2006 .

[10]  Marco Conti,et al.  Mobile Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Networks: From Theory to Reality , 2007, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[11]  Jin-Shyan Lee,et al.  An experiment on performance study of IEEE 802.15.4 wireless networks , 2005, 2005 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation.

[12]  M. Madou Fundamentals of microfabrication , 1997 .

[13]  Rodger E. Ziemer,et al.  Elements of Engineering Probability and Statistics , 1996 .

[14]  Andrew S. Tanenbaum,et al.  Computer networks, 4th Edition , 2002 .

[15]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Distributed Environmental Monitoring Using Random Sensor Networks , 2003, IPSN.

[16]  Robert A. Scholtz,et al.  Performance Analysis of , 1998 .

[17]  D. Lewis,et al.  Monitoring high-seas fisheries with long-range passive acoustic sensors , 1996, OCEANS 96 MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings. The Coastal Ocean - Prospects for the 21st Century.

[18]  Gianmarco Romano,et al.  Performance evaluation in a large environment for the AWACS system , 1998, ICUPC '98. IEEE 1998 International Conference on Universal Personal Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8384).

[19]  尚弘 島影 National Institute of Standards and Technologyにおける超伝導研究及び生活 , 2001 .