Safety and cost-effectiveness of MIDCABG in high-risk CABG patients.

BACKGROUND Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass has been proposed as a potential therapeutic alternative in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. To evaluate this possibility we compared 15 high-risk (HR) patients in whom minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting was used as the method of revascularization with 41 consecutive patients who underwent conventional coronary artery bypass grafting during 1 month. METHODS Patients undergoing myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass were significantly older than their low-risk (LR) counterparts (72.2 +/- 11.6 versus 63.3 +/- 9.7 years, p = 0.006). The demographic profile for HR versus LR patients was as follows: female patients, 60.0% versus 26.8%, p = 0.02; diabetes, 20.0% versus 24.4%, p = 0.7; prior stroke, 33.3% versus 7.4%, p = 0.03; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 60.0% versus 9.8%, p < 0.0001; peripheral vascular disease, 33.3% versus 12.2%, p = 0.03, congestive heart failure, 26.6% versus 9.8%, p = 0.09; impaired left ventricular (ejection fraction < 0.40), 40.0% versus 17.0%, p = 0.07; urgent operation, 86.6% versus 46.3%, p < 0.0001; and redo operation, 20.0% versus 0%, p = 0.003. RESULTS There were no deaths in the HR group and one death in the LR group. The average intensive care unit stay was 1.1 +/- 0.5 days in HR patients versus 1.6 +/- 1.6 days in LR individuals (p = 0.2), and the average hospital stay was 6.1 +/- 1.8 versus 7.3 +/- 4.4 days, respectively (p = 0.3). We used an acuity risk score index developed by the Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario to predict outcome in the HR group. The expected intensive care unit stay in HR patients was 4.1 +/- 1.2 days (versus the observed stay of 1.1 +/- 0.5 days, p < 0.0001), and the expected hospital stay was 12.5 +/- 1.5 days (versus the observed stay of 6.1 +/- 1.8 days, p < 0.0001). The expected mortality in the HR group was 6.1% versus 0%, p = 0.3. A cost regression model was used to examine predicted versus actual cost (in Canadian dollars) for the HR patient cohort (based on Ontario Ministry of Health funding). The expected cost for the HR cohort would have been $11,997 per patient. In contrast, the average cost for these 15 patients was $5,997 per patient, an estimated cost saving of 50%. CONCLUSIONS Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass appears to be a safe and cost-effective therapeutic modality for HR patients requiring myocardial revascularization.

[1]  J. Tu,et al.  Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. , 1995, Circulation.

[2]  M. Lipton,et al.  The VA cooperative randomized study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease II. Subgroup with significant left main lesions. , 1976, Circulation.

[3]  F H Edwards,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  L. Fisher,et al.  Comparison of operative mortality and morbidity for initial and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting: The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry experience. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  L. Goldman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness perspectives in coronary heart disease. , 1990, American heart journal.

[6]  L. Cohn,et al.  Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  E. Passamani,et al.  A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Bernstein,et al.  A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[9]  L. Mickleborough,et al.  Increased risk of urgent revascularization. , 1987, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[10]  F. Loop,et al.  Primary myocardial revascularization. Trends in surgical mortality. , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  F. Benetti,et al.  Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. , 1991, Chest.

[12]  E. Buffolo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  S. Fremes,et al.  The Current Status of Myocardial Revascularization: Changing Trends and Risk Factor Analysis , 1996, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[14]  S. Gallina,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting on a beating heart. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  M. Feinberg,et al.  Primary coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in impaired left ventricular function. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.