a Comparison of Uav and Tls Data for Soil Roughness Assessment

Abstract. Soil roughness represents fine-scale surface geometry which figures in many geophysical models. While static photogrammetric techniques (terrestrial images and laser scanning) have been recently proposed as a new source for deriving roughness heights, there is still need to overcome acquisition scale and viewing geometry issues. By contrast to the static techniques, images taken from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) can maintain near-nadir looking geometry over scales of several agricultural fields. This paper presents a pilot study on high-resolution, soil roughness reconstruction and assessment from UAV images over an agricultural plot. As a reference method, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was applied on a 10 m x 1.5 m subplot. The UAV images were self-calibrated and oriented within a bundle adjustment, and processed further up to a dense-matched digital surface model (DSM). The analysis of the UAV- and TLS-DSMs were performed in the spatial domain based on the surface autocorrelation function and the correlation length, and in the frequency domain based on the roughness spectrum and the surface fractal dimension (spectral slope). The TLS- and UAV-DSM differences were found to be under ±1 cm, while the UAV DSM showed a systematic pattern below this scale, which was explained by weakly tied sub-blocks of the bundle block. The results also confirmed that the existing TLS methods leads to roughness assessment up to 5 mm resolution. However, for our UAV data, this was not possible to achieve, though it was shown that for spatial scales of 12 cm and larger, both methods appear to be usable. Additionally, this paper suggests a method to propagate measurement errors to the correlation length.

[1]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Applying Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Soil Surface Roughness Assessment , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Wolfgang Dierking,et al.  Quantitative roughness characterization of geological surfaces and implications for radar signature analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  On the Soil Roughness Parameterization Problem in Soil Moisture Retrieval of Bare Surfaces from Synthetic Aperture Radar , 2008, Sensors.

[4]  Roland Perko,et al.  QUALITY COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND FILM-BASED IMAGES FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PURPOSES , 2004 .

[5]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Feature Based Methods for Structure and Motion Estimation , 1999, Workshop on Vision Algorithms.

[6]  K. Jacobsen EFFECTIVE RESOLUTION OF DIGITAL FRAME IMAGES , 2009 .

[7]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  Digital close range photogrammetry for measurement of soil erosion , 2005 .

[8]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  ORIENTAL - AUTOMATIC GEO-REFERENCING AND ORTHO-RECTIFICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS , 2013 .

[9]  M. Rothermel,et al.  SURE : PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION FROM IMAGER Y , 2013 .

[10]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  ASIFT: A New Framework for Fully Affine Invariant Image Comparison , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[11]  Thuy Le Toan,et al.  A comparison between soil roughness statistics used in surface scattering models derived from mechanical and laser profilers , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Richard K. Moore,et al.  Microwave Remote Sensing, Active and Passive , 1982 .

[13]  Marco Dubbini,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for High-Resolution Reconstruction of Topography: The Structure from Motion Approach on Coastal Environments , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Thuy Le Toan,et al.  Joint statistical properties of RMS height and correlation length derived from multisite 1-m roughness measurements , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Dirk Langer,et al.  Imaging Ladar for 3-D Surveying and CAD Modeling of Real-World Environments , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  P. Ho Geoscience And Remote Sensing , 2014 .

[17]  K. Kraus Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans , 2007 .

[18]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  A Correspondence Framework for ALS Strip Adjustments based on Variants of the ICP Algorithm , 2015 .

[19]  H. Maas,et al.  Quantitative Measurement of Soil Erosion from Tls and Uav Data , 2013 .

[20]  D. Lichti,et al.  Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners , 2006 .

[21]  Yisok Oh,et al.  Condition for precise measurement of soil surface roughness , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..