Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences.

Speakers tend to reproduce syntactic structures that they have recently comprehended or produced. This structural or syntactic priming occurs despite differences in the particular conceptual or event roles expressed in prime and target sentences (Bock & Loebell, 1990). In two sentence recall studies, we used the tendency of speakers to paraphrase the finite complements of object-raising verbs as infinitive complements (e.g., "John believed that Mary was nice" as "John believed Mary to be nice") to test whether an additional conceptual role would affect priming. Prime constructions with identical constituent orders as object-raising infinitives but an additional conceptual role ("John persuaded Mary to be nice") resulted in fewer paraphrases. Contrasts with other constructions suggest that the critical difference between primes was this extra conceptual role. Thus, subtle differences in conceptual structures can affect how speakers grammatically encode message elements.

[1]  T. Givón,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction , 1982 .

[2]  T. Givon.  Functionalism and Grammar , 1995 .

[3]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  The effect of a pragmatic presupposition on syntactic structure in question answering , 1977 .

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar , 1966 .

[5]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language , 1995 .

[6]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .

[7]  Brett Hyde,et al.  The structures of the to-infinitive , 2000 .

[8]  K Bock,et al.  Language production: Methods and methodologies , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Planning units and syntax in sentence production , 1978, Cognition.

[10]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[11]  J. Mehler.  Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of english sentences , 1963 .

[12]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[13]  K. Bock.  Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .

[14]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Facilitation in Agrammatic Sentence Production , 1998, Brain and Language.

[15]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .

[16]  K. Bock.  An Effect of the Accessibility of Word Forms on Sentence Structures , 1987 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[18]  Donna Jo Napoli.  Syntax: Theory and Problems , 1993 .

[19]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[20]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[22]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[23]  Howard Williams,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction II , 1992 .

[24]  Robert A. Boakes,et al.  Prompted recall of sentences , 1967 .

[25]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  K. Bock,et al.  Structure in language. Creating form in talk. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[27]  W. Labov,et al.  Constraints on the agentless passive , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.

[28]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications , 1978 .

[29]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-Based Syntax and Semantics: Volume 1, Fundamentals , 1987 .

[30]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Aspects of language production , 2000 .

[31]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Memory for semantic features in the verb , 1969 .

[33]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[34]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[35]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production , 2000, Cognition.

[36]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[37]  F. Goldman-Eisler.  Pauses, Clauses, Sentences , 1972, Language and speech.

[38]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[40]  M. Pickering,et al.  Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. , 2002 .

[41]  T. Givón,et al.  English grammar : a function-based introduction , 1995 .

[42]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs , 1993, Cognition.

[43]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[44]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Connectionist models of language production: lexical access and grammatical encoding , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[47]  D. Estival,et al.  Syntactic priming of the passive in English , 1985 .

[48]  R. Rommetveit,et al.  Focus of attention in recall of active and passive sentences , 1968 .

[49]  Mark Smith.  Conceptual structures in language production. , 2000 .

[50]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[51]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[52]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[53]  M. Potter,et al.  Syntactic Priming in Immediate Recall of Sentences , 1998 .

[54]  Claudia Felser,et al.  Verbal Complement Clauses: A minimalist study of direct perception constructions , 1999 .

[55]  C. Phillips,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[56]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Talking voices: Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk , 1987 .

[57]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Persistence in Dutch , 1998, Language and speech.

[58]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[59]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .

[60]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[62]  Franklin Chang,et al.  Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[63]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[64]  Chet A. Greider.  On the Explanation of Transformations , 1979 .