Electrophysiological Correlates of Second-Language Syntactic Processes Are Related to Native and Second Language Distance Regardless of Age of Acquisition

In the present study, we investigate how early and late L2 learners process L2 grammatical traits that are either present or absent in their native language (L1). Thirteen early (AoA = 4 years old) and 13 late (AoA = 18 years old) Spanish learners of Basque performed a grammatical judgment task on auditory Basque sentences while their event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded. The sentences contained violations of a syntactic property specific to participants' L2, i.e., ergative case, or violations of a syntactic property present in both of the participants' languages, i.e., verb agreement. Two forms of verb agreement were tested: subject agreement, found in participants' L1 and L2, and object agreement, present only in participants' L2. Behaviorally, early bilinguals were more accurate in the judgment task than late L2 learners. Early bilinguals showed native-like ERPs for verb agreement, which differed from the late learners' ERP pattern. Nonetheless, approximation to native-likeness was greater for the subject-verb agreement processing, the type of verb-agreement present in participants' L1, compared to object-verb agreement, the type of verb-agreement present only in participants' L2. For the ergative argument alignment, unique to L2, the two non-native groups showed similar ERP patterns which did not correspond to the natives' ERP pattern. We conclude that non-native syntactic processing approximates native processing for early L2 acquisition and high proficiency levels when the syntactic property is common to the L1 and L2. However, syntactic traits that are not present in the L1 do not rely on native-like processing, despite early AoA and high proficiency.

[1]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on the Recruitment of Early Processes for Syntactic Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Tanner,et al.  Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[4]  M. Balconi,et al.  Comprehending Semantic and Grammatical Violations in Italian. N400 and P600 Comparison with Visual and Auditory Stimuli , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[5]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Native and Nonnative Speakers' Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Adam Zawiszewski,et al.  Word Order Processing in a Second Language: From VO to OV , 2013, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[7]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  ERPs and Domain Specificity: Beating a Straw Horse , 1998 .

[9]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies , 2002, Neuroreport.

[10]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Yan Yan,et al.  ERP evidence for different strategies employed by native speakers and L2 learners in sentence processing , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[12]  L. Stowe,et al.  Second language processing: when are first and second languages processed similarly? , 2008 .

[13]  C. Phillips,et al.  The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations , 2007, Brain Research.

[14]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[15]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The N400 as a correlate of interpretively relevant linguistic rules: Evidence from Hindi , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  D. Tanner,et al.  Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension* , 2013, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[19]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  An ERP study of agreement features in Spanish , 2007, Brain Research.

[20]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Expe: An expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments , 1997 .

[21]  A Hahne,et al.  What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[22]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[23]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b , 2001 .

[24]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  A person is not a number: Discourse involvement in subject–verb agreement computation , 2011, Brain Research.

[25]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing , 2009, Brain and Language.

[27]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The resolution of case conflicts from a neurophysiological perspective. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  R. D. Rijk Standard Basque: A Progressive Grammar , 2007 .

[30]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  On the cross-linguistic validity of electrophysiological correlates of morphosyntactic processing: A study of case and agreement violations in Basque , 2011, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[31]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  A. Friederici,et al.  Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing , 2003 .

[33]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[34]  L. Petitto,et al.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967, Neurology.

[35]  Robert Fiorentino,et al.  Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1–L2 similarity and structural distance , 2014 .

[36]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity* , 2010, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[37]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  An ERP Study of Second Language Learning after Childhood: Effects of Proficiency , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  E. Lenneberg Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[41]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[42]  H. Barber,et al.  Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish – Evidence from Event Related Potentials , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning , 2010 .

[44]  Natasha Tokowicz,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels , 2010 .

[45]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Morphosyntactic Processing in Late Second-Language Learners , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  Adam Zawiszewski,et al.  Language distance and non-native syntactic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials* , 2010, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[48]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEASURES OF SENSITIVITY TO VIOLATIONS IN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR: An Event-Related Potential Investigation , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[49]  Ping Li,et al.  ERP signatures of subject–verb agreement in L2 learning , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[50]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing. , 2006 .

[51]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Impact of Proficiency on Syntactic Second-language Processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  I. Laka,et al.  Phi-features reloaded: An event-related potential study on person and number agreement processing , 2015, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[53]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Processing canonical and non-canonical sentences in Basque: The case of object–verb agreement as revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2009, Brain Research.

[54]  S. Frisch,et al.  The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing , 2001, Neuroreport.

[55]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[56]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses , 1998, Biological Psychology.