The Evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: Publications, Performance and Perceptions

This article examines how the UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), along with the development of performance indicators, fits into the production of research within a changing policy context. The historical evolution of the RAE from 1985–2001 is considered, before looking specifically at how research output (in the form of journal publications) was, and is, assessed. Changes in process and output measurements necessitated a move from quantitative to quality evaluation, which affected both academic publishing and the role of journals within the RAE. The issue of quality – in terms of perceptions and performance – as applied to both is explored.

[1]  Alison Wells.  Exploring the development of the independent, electronic, scholarly journal , 2000, Inf. Res..

[2]  Henry Miller.  The Management of Change in Universities: Universities, State and Economy in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. , 1995 .

[3]  A. Williamson,et al.  Journal Publishing , 1997 .

[4]  Jonathan E. Smith,et al.  The Behavioral Sciences and Management: An Evaluation of Relevant Journals , 1990 .

[5]  Janet Fisher,et al.  Traditional publishers and electronic journals , 1996 .

[6]  Les Carr,et al.  Mandated online RAE CVs Linked to University Eprint Archives , 2003 .

[7]  J. Barnard.  Reflections on Britain's Research Assessment Exercise , 1998 .

[8]  R. J. Tersine,et al.  An empirical assessment of the perceived relevance and quality of POM-related journals by academicians , 1991 .

[9]  Lyle V. Jones,et al.  An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Humanities. , 1982 .

[10]  Sven Hemlin,et al.  Research on research evaluation , 1996 .

[11]  M. Strathern.  ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system , 1997, European Review.

[12]  Raphael Gillett,et al.  Research Performance Indicators Based on Peer Review: A Critical Analysis , 1989 .

[13]  Maurice Kogan,et al.  Reforming Higher Education , 1999 .

[14]  J. Sizer.  Assessing Institutional Performance--An Overview. , 1979 .

[15]  M. Henkel,et al.  The modernisation of research evaluation: The case of the UK , 1999 .

[16]  H. Willmott.  Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the U.K. , 1995 .

[17]  I. Crewe.  Reputation, research and reality: The publication records of UK Departments of Politics, 1978–1984 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[18]  M. Jones,et al.  UK Accountants' Perceptions of Research Journal Quality , 1996 .

[19]  John M. Braxton,et al.  Assessing Faculty Scholarly Performance. , 1986 .

[20]  Kieron Flanagan,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Purchase, Management and Use of Large-scale Research Equipment in the UK and US Universities (report for Evidence Ltd on behalf of the Higher Education Funding Council for England) , 2002 .

[21]  Martin Parker,et al.  The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity , 1995 .

[22]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Do citations matter? , 1994, J. Inf. Sci..