Induction of cortical plastic changes in wrist muscles by paired associative stimulation in healthy subjects and post-stroke patients

It has been shown on hand muscles in normal subjects that paired associative stimulation (PAS) combining peripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induces lasting changes in cortical motor excitability (Stefan et al., Brain 123 (Pt3):572–584, 2000). Because the motor recovery of distal upper limb and particularly wrist extension in post-stroke patients is one of the major rehabilitation challenge, we investigate here the effect of one session of paired associative stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal projection to extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle (motor evoked potential size) before and after PAS in 17 healthy subjects and in two patients 5 months after stroke. The time course, the topographical specificity, changes in rest motor threshold (RMT), short intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation (SICI and ICF), the respective role of cutaneous and muscular afferents and the effect of a prolonged peripheral stimulation alone were also studied in normal subjects. Using a protocol derived from that of Ridding et al. J Physiol 537:623–631 (2001), PAS was able to induce lasting changes in the excitability of corticospinal projection to wrist muscles in healthy subjects and in the two post-stroke patients studied. Electrophysiological features of these plastic changes were similar to those previously observed in hand muscles: rapid evolution, 30–60 min duration, reversibility, relative topographical specificity and associative dependence suggesting an LTP-like mechanism. A contribution of cutaneous afferents in inducing PAS effects was also demonstrated. The decrease in ECR RMT after PAS observed in patients and in healthy subjects was an unexpected result because it has not been previously reported in the hand muscles of healthy subjects. However, it has been observed in dystonic patients (Quartarone et al., Brain 126:2586–2596, 2003). This suggests that other mechanisms like changes in membrane excitability could be involved in ECR facilitation after PAS. Further studies performed on patients using daily repeated PAS protocols and showing a functional improvement in hand motor function will be necessary to confirm that this technique could be relevant in motor rehabilitation, at least for some selected patients.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  D. Linden,et al.  The other side of the engram: experience-driven changes in neuronal intrinsic excitability , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Siebner,et al.  Abnormal associative plasticity of the human motor cortex in writer's cramp. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Goldring,et al.  Comparative study of sensory input to motor cortex in animals and man. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Demonstration of facilitatory I wave interaction in the human motor cortex by paired transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  R. Chen,et al.  Facilitatory I wave interaction in proximal arm and lower limb muscle representations of the human motor cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  B. Steinhoff,et al.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[10]  鯨井 隆 Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex , 1994 .

[11]  P. Rossini,et al.  Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[12]  J. L. Taylor,et al.  Mechanisms of motor‐evoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low‐frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neurology.

[14]  M. Ridding,et al.  Modification of the human motor cortex by associative stimulation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Peripheral afferent inputs to the forelimb area of the monkey motor cortex: Input-output relations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Associative plasticity in human motor cortex during voluntary muscle contraction. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[18]  L. Cohen,et al.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  T. S. Miles,et al.  Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  M. Ridding,et al.  Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by paired associative stimulation , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Ridding,et al.  Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? , 2003, Neurology.

[23]  M. Ridding,et al.  Induction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  D. Ruge,et al.  Learning Modifies Subsequent Induction of Long-Term Potentiation-Like and Long-Term Depression-Like Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.