Dynamics of Social Interaction: Kinematic Analysis of a Joint Action

Non-verbal social interaction between humans requires accurate understanding of the others’ actions. The cognitivist approach suggests that successful interaction depends on the creation of a shared representation of the task, where the pairing of perceptive and motor systems of partners allows inclusion of the other’s goal into the overarching representation. Activity of the Mirror Neurons System (MNS) is thought to be a crucial mechanism linking two individuals during a joint action through action observation. The construction of a shared representation of an interaction (i.e., joint action) depends upon sensorimotor cognitive processes that modulate the ability to adapt in time and space. We attempted to detect individuals’ behavioral/kinematic change resulting in a global amelioration of performance for both subjects when a common representation of the action is built using a repetitive joint action. We asked pairs of subjects to carry out a simple task where one puts a base in the middle of a table and the other places a parallelepiped fitting into the base, the crucial manipulation being that participants switched roles during the experiment. We aimed to show that a full comprehension of a joint action is not an automatic process. We found that, before switching the interactional role, the participant initially placing the base orientated it in a way that led to an uncomfortable action for participants placing the parallelepiped. However, after switching roles, the action’s kinematics by the participant who places the base changed in order to facilitate the action of the other. More precisely, our data shows significant modulation of the base angle in order to ease the completion of the joint action, highlighting the fact that a shared knowledge of the complete action facilitates the generation of a common representation. This evidence suggests the ability to establish an efficient shared representation of a joint action benefits from physically taking our partner’s perspective because simply observing the actions of others may not be enough.

[1]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains , 2014, NeuroImage.

[4]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Does the Human Motor System Simulate Pinocchio's Actions? , 2007, Psychological science.

[5]  J. Kelso,et al.  From the Cover : The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination , 2007 .

[6]  G. Leibniz,et al.  New Essays on Human Understanding. , 1981 .

[7]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  H J Keselman,et al.  Repeated measures F tests and psychophysiological research: controlling the number of false positives. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  V. Gallese The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity , 2003, Psychopathology.

[11]  V. Gallese The ‘‘shared manifold’’ hypothesis: from mirror neurons to empathy , 2001 .

[12]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Single-Neuron Responses in Humans during Execution and Observation of Actions , 2010, Current Biology.

[13]  J. Kelso,et al.  The coordination dynamics of social neuromarkers , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Social Requests and Social Affordances: How They Affect the Kinematics of Motor Sequences during Interactions between Conspecifics , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Seeing the world through another person’s eyes: Simulating selective attention via action observation , 2009, Cognition.

[18]  Andrea Brovelli,et al.  Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  How “Social” is the social Simon effect? , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[21]  Matteo Candidi,et al.  Causative role of left aIPS in coding shared goals during human–avatar complementary joint actions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[22]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  U. Alon,et al.  The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  Neural correlates of non-verbal social interactions: A dual-EEG study , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Granger Causality Mapping during Joint Actions Reveals Evidence for Forward Models That Could Overcome Sensory-Motor Delays , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  Timothy N Welsh,et al.  When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions. , 2009, Human movement science.

[27]  B. Hommel Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[28]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  M. Candidi,et al.  Commentary: Hand and Grasp Selection in a Preferential Reaching Task: The Effects of Object Location, Orientation, and Task Intention , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[30]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  R. Lemon Descending pathways in motor control. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Lillian Rigoli,et al.  Effects of Complementary Control on the Coordination Dynamics of Joint-Action , 2015, CogSci.

[34]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[35]  Girijesh Prasad,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of intentional social coordination in the 10–12Hz range , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  Lucia M. Sacheli,et al.  Social cues to joint actions: the role of shared goals , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[38]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  R. Hari,et al.  Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. , 2009, Physiological reviews.

[40]  Jérôme Dokic,et al.  From mirror neurons to joint actions , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[41]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  Neural alpha oscillations index the balance between self-other integration and segregation in real-time joint action , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Exploring the brain basis of joint action: Co-ordination of actions, goals and intentions , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[43]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  Coordination Dynamics , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[46]  Jacob S Nteere,et al.  Information Capacity of the Human Motor system , 1982 .

[47]  G. Cole,et al.  The Role of Attention in a Joint-Action Effect , 2014, PloS one.

[48]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervous system , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..