Fine-grain beta diversity in Palaearctic open vegetation: variability within and between biomes and vegetation types

Aims: To quantify how fine-grain (within-plot) beta diversity differs among biomes and vegetation types. Study area: Palaearctic biogeographic realm. Methods: We extracted 4,654 nested-plot series with at least four different grain sizes between 0.0001 m² and 1,024 m² from the GrassPlot database spanning broad geographic and ecological gradients. Next, we calculated the slope parameter (z-value) of the power-law species–area relationship (SAR) to use as a measure of multiplicative beta diversity. We did this separately for vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens and for the three groups combined (complete vegetation). We then tested whether z-values differed between biomes, ecological-physiognomic vegetation types at coarse and fine levels and phytosociological classes. Results: We found that z-values varied significantly among biomes and vegetation types. The explanatory power of area for species richness was highest for vascular plants, followed by complete vegetation, bryophytes and lichens. Within each species group, the explained variance increased with typological resolution. In vascular plants, adjusted R2 was 0.14 for biomes, but reached 0.50 for phytosociological classes. Among the biomes, mean z-values were particularly high in the Subtropics with winter rain (Mediterranean biome) and the Dry tropics and subtropics. Natural grasslands had higher z-values than secondary grasslands. Alpine and Mediterranean vegetation types had particularly high z-values whereas managed grasslands with benign soil and climate conditions and saline communities were characterised by particularly low z-values. Conclusions: In this study relating fine-grain beta diversity to typological units, we found distinct patterns. As we explain in a conceptual figure, these can be related to ultimate drivers, such as productivity, stress and disturbance, which can influence z-values via multiple pathways. The provided means, medians and quantiles of z-values for a wide range of typological entities provide benchmarks for local to continental studies, while calling for additional data from under-represented units. Syntaxonomic references: Mucina et al. (2016) for classes occurring in Europe; Ermakov (2012) for classes restricted to Asia. Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; EDGG = Eurasian Dry Grassland Group; SAR = species-area relationship.

[1]  S. Franklin,et al.  Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review , 2021, Vegetation Classification and Survey.

[2]  Wenhong Ma,et al.  Benchmarking plant diversity of Palaearctic grasslands and other open habitats , 2021, Journal of Vegetation Science.

[3]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Fine‐grain beta diversity of Palaearctic grassland vegetation , 2021, Journal of Vegetation Science.

[4]  Jianshuang Wu,et al.  Scale dependence of species–area relationships is widespread but generally weak in Palaearctic grasslands , 2021 .

[5]  S. Boch,et al.  Grasslands of the Palaearctic Biogeographic Realm: Introduction and Synthesis , 2020 .

[6]  Michael C. Thrun,et al.  Analyzing the fine structure of distributions , 2019, PloS one.

[7]  J. Dengler,et al.  GrassPlot v. 2.00 – first update on the database of multi-scale plant diversity in Palaearctic grasslands , 2019, Palaearctic Grasslands - Journal of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group.

[8]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Species–area relationships in continuous vegetation: Evidence from Palaearctic grasslands , 2019, Journal of Biogeography.

[9]  R. Whittaker,et al.  sars: an R package for fitting, evaluating and comparing species–area relationship models , 2019, Ecography.

[10]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  sPlot – A new tool for global vegetation analyses , 2019, Journal of Vegetation Science.

[11]  Thomas Becker,et al.  GrassPlot – a database of multi-scale plant diversity in Palaearctic grasslands , 2018, Phytocoenologia.

[12]  Walter Jetz,et al.  A global inventory of mountains for bio-geographical applications , 2016, Alpine Botany.

[13]  Panayotis Dimopoulos,et al.  Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities , 2016 .

[14]  S. Boch,et al.  Assessing plant diversity and composition in grasslands across spatial scales: the standardised EDGG sampling methodology , 2016 .

[15]  D. Storch The theory of the nested species–area relationship: geometric foundations of biodiversity scaling , 2016 .

[16]  J. Dengler,et al.  Scale- and taxon-dependent patterns of plant diversity in steppes of Khakassia, South Siberia (Russia) , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  Javier Loidi,et al.  European Red List of Habitats : Part 2. Terrestrial and freshwater habitats , 2016 .

[18]  Zoltán Botta-Dukát,et al.  A comparative framework for broad‐scale plot‐based vegetation classification , 2015 .

[19]  C. Dormann,et al.  Accounting for geographical variation in species–area relationships improves the prediction of plant species richness at the global scale , 2014 .

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  S. Boch,et al.  Dry grasslands of NW Bulgarian mountains: first insights into diversity, ecology and syntaxonomy , 2013 .

[22]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Invasive Plants Have Scale-Dependent Effects on Diversity by Altering Species-Area Relationships , 2013, Science.

[23]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Plant species richness: the world records , 2012 .

[24]  J. Dengler,et al.  Festuco-Brometea communities of the Transylvanian Plateau (Romania) - a preliminary overview on syntaxonomy, ecology, and biodiversity , 2012 .

[25]  N. Jürgens,et al.  Biodiversity in Southern Africa. Volume 2: Patterns and Processes at Regional Scale , 2012 .

[26]  J. Dengler,et al.  Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation , 2009 .

[27]  Carl Beierkuhnlein,et al.  Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity , 2009, Oecologia.

[28]  F. Micheli,et al.  Human impacts on the species-area relationship in reef fish assemblages. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[29]  R. Trumbull,et al.  The ecozones of the world: the ecological divisions of the geosphere , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[30]  M. Williamson Species–area relationships at small scales in continuum vegetation , 2003 .

[31]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[32]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[33]  A. Shmida,et al.  Biological determinants of species diversity , 1985 .

[34]  R. Whittaker Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[35]  O. Arrhenius,et al.  Species and Area , 1921 .