Analysis of dimorphic structures of the human pelvis: its implications for sex estimation in samples without reference collections

This work deals with the analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in skeletal samples of human prehistoric populations for which adequate reference collections of known sex are not available. We use geometric morphometric techniques based on semilandmarks in order to quantify shape variation of the greater sciatic notch and ischiopubic region. Firstly, intra- and interobserver error associated with the placement of point coordinates in geometric morphometric analyses were evaluated through intraclass correlation coefficient and Kappa index. Our results indicate that such techniques, in contrast to morphoscopic analysis, allow quantification and objective description of sexual dimorphism in pelvic traits, as well as, performing repeated analyses of numerous individuals with no previous observer experience required. Secondly, relative warp analyses calculated based on semilandmarks were used to describe sexual dimorphism pattern of the ischiopubic region and the greater sciatic notch of two unknown sex Amerindian samples from Argentina, and k-means clustering analysis was applied to detect two groups within each sample. One sample corresponds to hunter-gatherers from South Argentina (n ¼ 29), whereas the other comprises farmers from Northwest Argentina (n ¼ 30). The results obtained suggest that: (a) the first relative warps axis obtained for both structures summarizes shape changes due to sexual dimorphism; (b) the individuals grouped into clusters can be assigned as female or male based on their shape; and (c) sexual dimorphism is not equally expressed in both archaeological samples. These findings support the hypothesis that patterns of pelvic sexual dimorphism vary among human populations and thus, criteria for sexing are population-specific. 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  K. Rosenberg A LATE PLEISTOCENE HUMAN SKELETON FROM LIUJIANG, CHINA SUGGESTS REGIONAL POPULATION VARIATION IN SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE HUMAN PELVIS , 2002 .

[2]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Morphometric Spaces, Shape Components and the Effects of Linear Transformations , 1996 .

[3]  L. F. Marcus,et al.  Advances in Morphometrics , 1996, NATO ASI Series.

[4]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[5]  S. Maclaughlin,et al.  The accuracy of sex identification in European skeletal remains using the phenice characters. , 1990, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  Maria Augusta Rocha Les collections ostéologiques humaines identifiées du Musée Anthropologique de l'Université de Coimbra , 1995 .

[7]  M. Işcan,et al.  Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton , 1989 .

[8]  J. Brůžek,et al.  Reliability test of the visual assessment of cranial traits for sex determination. , 2004, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  S. Hodge,et al.  Statistics and Probability , 1972 .

[10]  W. M. Krogman The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[11]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[12]  J. Brůžek Fiabilité des fonctions discriminantes dans la détermination sexuelle de l'os coxal: critiques et propositions , 1992 .

[13]  T. Holland Sex assessment using the proximal tibia. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  F. Rothhammer,et al.  Craniometrical variation among South American prehistoric populations: climatic, altitudinal, chronological, and geographic contributions. , 1990, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  S. Mays,et al.  Some Sexually Dimorphic Features of the Human Juvenile Skull and their Value in Sex Determination in Immature Skeletal Remains , 1998 .

[16]  S. Maclaughlin,et al.  Population variation in sexual dimorphism in the human innominate , 1986 .

[17]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’ , 2004 .

[18]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[19]  Antonio Rosas,et al.  Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[20]  R. Meindl,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN METHOD AND THEORY IN PALEODEMOGRAPHY , 1998 .

[21]  J. Arsuaga,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the sexual dimorphism of the hip bone in a modern human population and in early hominids. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  T W Phenice,et al.  A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[23]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[24]  M. F. Torres,et al.  La población prehispánica de Las Pirguas (Salta, Argentina) , 1996 .

[25]  H. Sheets,et al.  A combined landmark and outline-based approach to ontogenetic shape change in the Ordovician trilobite Triarthrus becki , 2004 .

[26]  M. Steyn,et al.  Geometric morphometric analysis of the greater sciatic notch in South Africans. , 2004, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[27]  J V Taylor,et al.  Multiple discriminant function analysis of sex and race in the postcranial skeleton. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[29]  Sven Kreiborg,et al.  Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  J. Plavcan Comparison of four simple methods for estimating sexual dimorphism in fossils. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[31]  Jaroslav Bruzek,et al.  A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[32]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  Julieta Gómez Otero,et al.  Costumbres funerarias y esqueletos humanos: variabilidad y poblamiento en la costa nordeste de la provincia del Chubut (Patagonia Argentina) , 1998 .

[34]  M Henneberg,et al.  Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. , 1996, American journal of physical anthropology.

[35]  D. Mittler,et al.  Sex determination in subadults using auricular surface morphology: a forensic science perspective. , 1992, Journal of forensic sciences.

[36]  T Sitalaximi,et al.  Autosomal microsatellite profile of three socially diverse ethnic Tamil populations of India. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[37]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains , 1994 .

[38]  L. Konigsberg,et al.  Use of ordinal categorical variables in skeletal assessment of sex from the cranium. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[39]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Sex prediction by discriminant function with central portion measures of innominate bones , 1997 .

[40]  Sang‐Hee Lee Assigned Resampling Method: A new method to estimate size sexual dimorphism in samples of unknown sex , 2001, Anthropological Review.

[41]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  R. Tague Variation in pelvic size between males and females. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[43]  R. Sutter Nonmetric subadult skeletal sexing traits: I. A blind test of the accuracy of eight previously proposed methods using prehistoric known-sex mummies from northern Chile. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[44]  John Albanese,et al.  A metric method for sex determination using the hipbone and the femur. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[45]  F. Bookstein Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[46]  Phillip L Walker,et al.  Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[47]  M. Steyn,et al.  Metric assessment of race from the pelvis in South Africans. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[48]  M Steyn,et al.  Sexually dimorphic pelvic morphology in South African whites and blacks. , 2003, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[49]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[50]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Eigenshape Analysis of Left Ventricular Outlines from Contrast Ventriculograms , 1996 .

[51]  S. Genovés Diferencias sexuales en el hueso coxal , 1959 .

[52]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[53]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..