Nanopore stochastic detection: diversity, sensitivity, and beyond.

Nanopore sensors have emerged as a label-free and amplification-free technique for measuring single molecules. First proposed in the mid-1990s, nanopore detection takes advantage of the ionic current modulations produced by the passage of target analytes through a single nanopore at a fixed applied potential. Over the last 15 years, these nanoscale pores have been used to sequence DNA, to study covalent and non-covalent bonding interactions, to investigate biomolecular folding and unfolding, and for other applications. A major issue in the application of nanopore sensors is the rapid transport of target analyte molecules through the nanopore. Current recording techniques do not always accurately detect these rapid events. Therefore, researchers have looked for methods that slow molecular and ionic transport. Thus far, several strategies can improve the resolution and sensitivity of nanopore sensors including variation of the experimental conditions, use of a host compound, and modification of the analyte molecule and the nanopore sensor. In this Account, we highlight our recent research efforts that have focused on applications of nanopore sensors including the differentiation of chiral molecules, the study of enzyme kinetics, and the determination of sample purity and composition. Then we summarize our efforts to regulate molecular transport. We show that the introduction of various surface functional groups such as hydrophobic, aromatic, positively charged, and negatively charged residues in the nanopore interior, an increase in the ionic strength of the electrolyte solution, and the use of ionic liquid solutions as the electrolyte instead of inorganic salts may improve the resolution and sensitivity of nanopore stochastic sensors. Our experiments also demonstrate that the introduction of multiple functional groups into a single nanopore and the development of a pattern-recognition nanopore sensor array could further enhance sensor resolution. Although we have demonstrated the feasibility of nanopore sensors for various applications, challenges remain before nanopore sensing is deployed for routine use in applications such as medical diagnosis, homeland security, pharmaceutical screening, and environmental monitoring.

[1]  N. Roxhed,et al.  Pt–Al2O3 dual layer atomic layer deposition coating in high aspect ratio nanopores , 2013, Nanotechnology.

[2]  M. Niederweis,et al.  Nanopore DNA sequencing with MspA , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  N. Magan,et al.  Electronic noses and disease diagnostics , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[4]  A. Aksimentiev,et al.  Molecular dynamics study of MspA arginine mutants predicts slow DNA translocations and ion current blockades indicative of DNA sequence. , 2012, ACS nano.

[5]  Gopal Das,et al.  Fluorometric Detection of Enzyme Activity with Synthetic Supramolecular Pores , 2002, Science.

[6]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  Pattern generation with synthetic sensing systems in lipid bilayer membranes , 2011 .

[7]  B. Chait,et al.  Artificial nanopores that mimic the transport selectivity of the nuclear pore complex , 2009, Nature.

[8]  R. Dutzler,et al.  The structural basis of ClC chloride channel function , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  T A Dickinson,et al.  Current trends in 'artificial-nose' technology. , 1998, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  Deqiang Wang,et al.  Real-time monitoring of peptide cleavage using a nanopore probe. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Jiwook Shim,et al.  Single-molecule detection of folding and unfolding of the G-quadruplex aptamer in a nanopore nanocavity , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  Dilani A. Jayawardhana,et al.  Stochastic Study of the Effect of Ionic Strength on Noncovalent Interactions in Protein Pores , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[13]  D. Branton,et al.  Rapid nanopore discrimination between single polynucleotide molecules. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  H. Bayley,et al.  Carriers versus adapters in stochastic sensing. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[15]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Electrostatic-gated transport in chemically modified glass nanopore electrodes. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  Stefan Howorka,et al.  Nanopore Analytics: Sensing of Single Molecules , 2009 .

[17]  H. Bayley,et al.  Stochastic Sensing of TNT with a Genetically Engineered Pore , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[18]  D. Talaga,et al.  Single-molecule protein unfolding in solid state nanopores. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Rapid determination of sample purity and composition by nanopore stochastic sensing. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[20]  B. Zhang,et al.  Nanoparticles: Imaging electrocatalysts in action. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[21]  Aleksei Aksimentiev,et al.  Detection of DNA sequences using an alternating electric field in a nanopore capacitor. , 2008, Nano letters.

[22]  Seong-Ho Shin,et al.  Single-molecule covalent chemistry with spatially separated reactants. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  Li-Qun Gu,et al.  Single protein pores containing molecular adapters at high temperatures. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  Zuzanna Siwy,et al.  Protein biosensors based on biofunctionalized conical gold nanotubes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  Li-Qun Gu,et al.  Capturing single molecules of immunoglobulin and ricin with an aptamer-encoded glass nanopore. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  S. Howorka,et al.  Sequence-specific detection of individual DNA strands using engineered nanopores , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  L. Gu,et al.  Method of creating a nanopore-terminated probe for single-molecule enantiomer discrimination. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  X. Guan,et al.  Unzipping of Double-stranded DNA in Engineered α-Hemolysin Pores. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[29]  Probing the Transport of Ionic Liquids in Aqueous Solution through Nanopores , 2011 .

[30]  Dilani A. Jayawardhana,et al.  Study of peptide transport through engineered protein channels. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[31]  Gustavo Stolovitzky,et al.  Slowing and controlling the translocation of DNA in a solid-state nanopore. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[32]  Daniel W Armstrong,et al.  Nanopore stochastic detection of a liquid explosive component and sensitizers using boromycin and an ionic liquid supporting electrolyte. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  H. Bayley,et al.  Stochastic detection of enantiomers. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  Gregory W. Bishop,et al.  Resistive-pulse studies of proteins and protein/antibody complexes using a conical nanotube sensor. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[35]  C. Boulin,et al.  Stochastic sensing of organic analytes by a pore-forming protein containing a molecular adapter , 2000 .

[36]  D. Branton,et al.  Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  J. Gouaux,et al.  Designed protein pores as components for biosensors. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.

[38]  Ruoshan Wei,et al.  Stochastic sensing of proteins with receptor-modified solid-state nanopores. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[39]  X. Guan,et al.  Translocation of single‐stranded DNA through the α‐hemolysin protein nanopore in acidic solutions , 2011, Electrophoresis.

[40]  S. Kuyucak,et al.  Physics of Ion Channels , 2003, Journal of biological physics.

[41]  M. Wanunu Nanopores: A journey towards DNA sequencing. , 2012, Physics of Life Reviews.

[42]  D. Branton,et al.  Voltage-driven DNA translocations through a nanopore. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[43]  R. Bashir,et al.  Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[44]  H. Bayley,et al.  Stochastic sensing of nanomolar inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate with an engineered pore. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[45]  X. Guan,et al.  Simultaneous detection of CMPA and PMPA, hydrolytes of soman and cyclosarin nerve agents, by nanopore analysis , 2013 .

[46]  Deqiang Wang,et al.  Stochastic sensing of biomolecules in a nanopore sensor array , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[47]  Mubarak Ali,et al.  Thermally controlled permeation of ionic molecules through synthetic nanopores functionalized with amine-terminated polymer brushes , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[48]  Deqiang Wang,et al.  Slowing DNA translocation through nanopores using a solution containing organic salts. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[49]  J. Joanny,et al.  Fast DNA translocation through a solid-state nanopore. , 2004, Nano letters.

[50]  H. Bayley,et al.  Stochastic sensors inspired by biology , 2001, Nature.

[51]  Deqiang Wang,et al.  Detection of nerve agent hydrolytes in an engineered nanopore , 2009 .

[52]  Hans Söderlund,et al.  Antibody-Based Bio-Nanotube Membranes for Enantiomeric Drug Separations , 2002, Science.