Predicting uncertain behavior of industrial system using FM - A practical case

As such the reliability of system is affected by many factors such as design, manufacturing, installation, commissioning, operation and maintenance. Consequently it may be extremely difficult if not impossible to model, analyze and predict the failure behavior of system. To this effect, the authors presented a structured framework which makes use of fuzzy methodology (FM), an approximate reasoning tool to deal with the imprecise, uncertain and subjective information related to system performance. The component related objective events are modeled with the help of the Petri net model of the system. Various parameters of managerial importance such as repair time, failure rate, mean time between failures, availability and expected number of failures are computed to quantify the uncertain behavior of system. Further, to improve upon the reliability characteristics of the system, in-depth qualitative analysis of unit is carried out using failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) by listing all possible failure modes and their causes. A decision support system based on fuzzy set theory is developed to counter the limitations of traditional FMEA. The framework has been applied to model and analyze a real complex industrial system from paper mill.

[1]  Kai-Yuan Cai,et al.  System failure engineering and fuzzy methodology An introductory overview , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[3]  Jezdimir Knezevic,et al.  Reliability modelling of repairable systems using Petri nets and fuzzy Lambda-Tau methodology , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Kostas Kalaitzakis,et al.  A fuzzy knowledge based method for maintenance planning in a power system , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Mohammad Modarres Reliability engineering and risk analysis , 1999 .

[6]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[7]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Engineering reliability : new techniques and applications , 1981 .

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[9]  P. O'Connor,et al.  Practical Reliability Engineering , 1981 .

[10]  Mohammed Khurshid Khan,et al.  Development of an Expert System for implementation of ISO 9000 quality systems , 1999 .

[11]  Reinhard German,et al.  Performance analysis of communication systems - modelling with non-Markovian stochastic Petri nets , 2000, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[12]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Engineering System Safety Analysis and Synthesis Using the Fuzzy Rule‐based Evidential Reasoning Approach , 2005 .

[13]  Gianfranco Ciardo,et al.  A Characterization of the Stochastic Process Underlying a Stochastic Petri Net , 1994, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[14]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Engineering , 1996 .

[15]  K. K. Aggarwal,et al.  Petri Net modelling and reliability evaluation of distributed processing systems , 1993 .

[16]  Charles E Ebeling,et al.  An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering , 1996 .

[17]  Jin Wang,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative safety modelling for marine systems , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Dai Pan,et al.  Architecture-based software reliability modeling , 2006, J. Syst. Softw..

[19]  Celso Marcelo Franklin Lapa,et al.  Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems , 2007, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Safety Analysis Using Petri Nets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[21]  David He,et al.  System Failure Analysis Through Counters of Petri Net Models , 2004 .

[22]  K. S. Sultan,et al.  Exact Bayesian Prediction of Exponential Lifetime Based on Fixed and Random Sample Sizes , 2005 .

[23]  Terje Aven,et al.  Implementing the Bayesian paradigm in risk analysis , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Ulrich Hauptmanns Semi-quantitative fault tree analysis for process plant safety using frequency and probability ranges , 2004 .

[25]  Gerald M. Knapp,et al.  A fuzzy scheme for failure mode screening , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[26]  G. S. Hura,et al.  The use of Petri nets to analyze coherent fault trees , 1988 .

[27]  Marco Savoia,et al.  Structural reliability analysis through fuzzy number approach, with application to stability , 2002 .

[28]  Chris T. Kiranoudis,et al.  A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Quality costing in process industries through QCAS: a practical case , 2007 .

[30]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling , 2005 .

[31]  Napsiah Ismail,et al.  A computer‐based intelligent system for fault diagnosis of an aircraft engine , 2004 .

[32]  Nathan Siu,et al.  Bayesian parameter estimation in probabilistic risk assessment , 1998 .

[33]  Katerina Goseva-Popstojanova,et al.  Architecture-based approach to reliability assessment of software systems , 2001, Perform. Evaluation.

[34]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Behavioural analysis of a paper production system with different repair policies , 1991 .