The influence of muscle activity on head-neck response during impact

In the past, muscle activation has been identified as having an important effect on the head-neck response in dynamic conditions. However, this claim has been largely based on global observations, and not by accurate analysis. In this study, the influence of muscle activation on the head-neck response is investigated by mathematical modeling. The detailed mathematical head-neck model presented by M. de Jager (See IRRD 891656 and 895764) is improved by modeling the neck muscles in more detail. A multi-segment muscle description is applied in which the muscles curve around the vertebrae, resulting in realistic muscle lines of action. The model is validated with human volunteer responses to frontal and lateral impact at several severities. The model response with maximum muscle activation to high severity frontal and lateral impacts agrees well with volunteer responses, whereas a submaximum activation level or a larger reflex delay provides better results for the low severity impacts. The simulations show that muscle contraction has a large influence on the head-neck response. (A) For the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD E201172.

[1]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A three-dimensional model of the human cervical spine for impact simulation. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  A I King,et al.  Electromyographic signals of the spinal musculature during +Gz impact acceleration. , 1977, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[3]  T. Szabo,et al.  Human Subject Kinematics and Electromyographic Activity During Low Speed Rear Impacts , 1996 .

[4]  W Goldsmith,et al.  Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading--II. Analytical/numerical model. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  A. Seireg,et al.  Biochemical Analysis Of The Musculoskeletal Structure For Medicine And Sports , 1989 .

[6]  Riender Happee,et al.  ADVANCES IN HUMAN BODY MODELLING USING MADYMO , 1994 .

[7]  G Raviv,et al.  Neck muscle resistance to head impact. , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Cervical range of motion and dynamic response and strength of cervical muscles , 1973 .

[9]  de Mkj Marko Jager,et al.  Mathematical head-neck models for acceleration impacts , 1996 .

[10]  A. Hill.  The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 1938 .

[11]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .

[12]  Dimitrios Kallieris,et al.  Comparison of Human Volunteer and Cadaver Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion , 1987 .

[13]  Daniel J. Thomas,et al.  Human Head and Neck Response to Impact Acceleration. , 1972 .

[14]  Richard G. Snyder,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN NECK IN LATERAL FLEXION , 1975 .

[15]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Strength and response of the human neck , 1971 .

[16]  Jack M. Winters,et al.  Analysis of Fundamental Human Movement Patterns Through the Use of In-Depth Antagonistic Muscle Models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  G M Halmagyi,et al.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[18]  de Mkj Marko Jager,et al.  A Global and a Detailed Mathematical Model for Head-Neck Dynamics , 1996 .

[19]  A. Hill.  First and Last Experiments in Muscle Mechanics , 1970 .

[20]  D. J. Thomas,et al.  Human Volunteer Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion: a New Analysis , 1995 .

[21]  H. J. Woltring,et al.  Omni-Directional Human Head-Neck Response , 1986 .