Different Perspectives on Teaching Lean Construction

There has been limited documentation in the literature on the structure of Lean Construction (LC) teaching. This may be due to the existence of multiple theoretical interpretations of LC and how its concepts may be adapted and applied in different project life cycle phases by using various tools, systems, and processes. To contribute to the discussion on teaching LC, this paper describes three distinct perspectives based on the authors’ experiences teaching in universities in the U.S. and Brazil. Specifically, we discuss how our teaching approaches involve readings, lectures, discussions, simulation exercises, team projects and assignments, field trips, and guest speakers to mix theory with action. This paper seeks to (1) document experiences and lessons learned from multiple LC course offerings and (2) promote the exchange of ideas between those teaching LC. Leveraging our unique teaching approaches and lessons learned, we develop basic recommendations for teaching an introductory course on LC in universities. While this paper’s primary audience will be those who teach university students, we hope those who teach practitioners will also benefit from the proposed instruction structure, participate in the conversation on teaching LC, and offer new ideas for providing “proof of concept” to students.

[1]  Bing Xing-guo Inclusion of Lean Construction in Higher Education , 2008 .

[2]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction , 1992 .

[3]  Stephen Emmitt Learning to Think and Detail From First (Leaner) Principles , 2003 .

[4]  Lincoln Forbes,et al.  Modern Construction : Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices , 2010 .

[5]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Construction Engineering—Reinvigorating the Discipline , 2011 .

[6]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Parade Game: Impact of Work Flow Variability on Succeeding Trade Performance , 1998 .

[7]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[8]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Interaction between subcycles: one key to improved methods , 1993 .

[9]  Jeff Cox,et al.  The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement , 1984 .

[10]  Jorge L. Izquierdo,et al.  LEAN CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION: BASIC MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS WORKSHOP , 2011 .

[11]  Stuart D. Green,et al.  Lean construction: arenas of enactment, models of diffusion and the meaning of ‘leanness’ , 2005 .

[12]  H. W. Parker,et al.  Productivity improvement in construction , 1988 .

[13]  Michael T. Kubal Engineered Quality in Construction: Partnering and Tqm , 1994 .

[14]  B. Hyatt A Case Study in Integrating Lean , Green , BIM into an Undergraduate Construction Management Scheduling Course , 2011 .

[15]  G. Howell,et al.  Integrated Project Delivery An Example Of Relational Contracting , 2005 .

[16]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .