Multimodality and ethnography: working at the intersection

This special issue of Qualitative Research was produced in the context of a comparatively recent surge in qualitative ‘multimodal’ research. A number of scholars from diverse disciplinary and theoretical traditions have turned to multimodality in their endeavours to understand everyday communication and interaction in contemporary social life, often foregrounding certain tensions with more established research traditions, such as ethnography. In this issue, we focus on the methodological and theoretical implications of bringing multimodality and ethnography into dialogue with each other – a development that, we think, throws up some provocative issues for qualitative research methodology. These include questions about the ‘epistemological compatibility’ of different approaches, when each carries particular theoretical and methodological histories and associations, and what might be gained and lost in endeavours to bring together their respective descriptive and analytic conventions.

[1]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning ! , 2005 .

[2]  C. Goodwin.  Action and embodiment within situated human interaction , 2000 .

[3]  S. Heath.  Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms , 1983 .

[4]  Michael Halliday.  Language As Social Semiotic , 1978 .

[5]  Anne Haas Dyson,et al.  Transitions and Tensions: Interrelationship between the Drawing, Talking, and Dictating of Young Children. , 1986 .

[6]  G. Kress.  Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy , 1997 .

[7]  Anne Haas Dyson,et al.  Writing superheroes : contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy , 1998 .

[8]  C. Heath,et al.  Body movement and speech in medical interaction: Postscript: the use of medical records and computers during the consultation , 1986 .

[9]  O. Solomon.  Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice by Dell Hymes. London, UK and Bristol, PA : Taylor & Francis (Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education series), 1996. Pp. xiv+258pp. , 1996 .

[10]  Lesley Lancaster.  Staring at the Page: The Functions of Gaze in a Young Child’s Interpretation of Symbolic Forms , 2001 .

[11]  D. Rowe.  Preschoolers As Authors: Literacy Learning in the Social World of the Classroom , 1994 .

[12]  B. Street.  Literacy in Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[13]  D. Rowe.  The Nature of Young Children's Authoring , 2003 .

[14]  Tim May,et al.  Analysing Interaction: Video, Ethnography and Situated Conduct , 2002 .

[15]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Contours of Culture: Complex Ethnography and the Ethnography of Complexity , 2007 .

[16]  A. Coffey,et al.  Multimodal ethnography , 2006 .

[17]  尾島 碩心.  Visual communication-1- , 1963 .

[18]  B. Asher.  The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[19]  Alfred Schuetz.  The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology , 1944, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  C. Heath,et al.  Crafting participation: designing ecologies, configuring experience , 2002 .

[21]  Anne Haas Dyson,et al.  The Brothers and Sisters Learn to Write: Popular Literacies in Childhood and School Cultures , 2003 .

[22]  C. Heath,et al.  Sharing the Tools of the Trade , 2000 .

[23]  Shirley Brice Heath,et al.  On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. Language & Literacy (NCRLL). , 2008 .

[24]  T. May.  Qualitative Research in Action , 2002 .

[25]  J. Maybin,et al.  Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion , 2007 .

[26]  Linguistic Ethnography: Links, Problems and Possibilities. , 2007 .

[27]  Janet Maybin,et al.  Literacy Under and Over the Desk: Oppositions and Heterogeneity , 2007 .