Three-dimensional modeling of EUV photoresist using the multivariate Poisson propagation model

Abstract. Background: As target feature sizes for EUV lithography shrink, it is becoming ever more important to understand the intricate details of photoresist materials, including the role of the “third dimension”—the dimension perpendicular to the wafer. With resist thicknesses shrinking toward the single-digit nanometer scale alongside target linewidths, small changes in resist performance in this dimension will have a greater overall effect on pattern quality. Aim: To use modeling to understand the effect that the third dimension has on resist performance, in particular the interplay between the third dimension and resist stochastics. Approach: We developed a three-dimensional version of the multivariate Poisson propagation model, a stochastic resist simulator. As a test case for the model, we explore the role of acid diffusion in the so-called third dimension by simulating 105 vias at a series of z-blur conditions. Results: Our model suggests that increased z-blur yields an improvement in both dose to size and pattern uniformity without sacrificing resolution. Conclusions: We have developed a 3D resist model that can simulate large numbers of contacts. Early results from the 3D model show improved patterning performance can be achieved by increasing the z-blur.

[1]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Relative importance of various stochastic terms and EUV patterning , 2018 .

[2]  Patrick Naulleau,et al.  Modeling of novel resist technologies , 2019, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Understanding extreme stochastic events in euv resists , 2017 .

[4]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Investigating EUV radiochemistry with condensed phase photoemission , 2019, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography X.

[5]  Hao Xu,et al.  Underlayer designs to enhance the performance of EUV resists , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Jing Guo,et al.  Inorganic hardmask development for extreme ultraviolet patterning , 2018 .

[7]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Fundamental limits to EUV photoresist , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Andreas Frommhold,et al.  Impact of local variability on defect-aware process windows , 2019, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  J A Sethian,et al.  A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Mack Development of Positive Photoresists , 1987 .

[11]  Gregg M. Gallatin Resist blur and line edge roughness (Invited Paper) , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Stefan De Gendt,et al.  Dissolution Rate Monitor Tool to Measure EUV Photoresist Dissolution , 2017 .

[13]  L. Shampine,et al.  A 3(2) pair of Runge - Kutta formulas , 1989 .

[14]  Ebo H. Croffie,et al.  Improving resist resolution and sensitivity via electric-field enhanced postexposure baking , 2002 .