The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial.

AIM To test whether a single session of motivational interviewing (discussing alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use) would lead successfully to reduction in use of these drugs or in perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people. DESIGN Cluster randomized trial, allocating 200 young people in the natural groups in which they were recruited to either motivational interviewing (n=105) or non-intervention education-as-usual control condition (n=95). SETTING Ten further education colleges across inner London. PARTICIPANTS Two hundred young people (age range 16-20 years) currently using illegal drugs, with whom contact was established through peers trained for the project. INTERVENTION The intervention was adapted from the literature on motivational interviewing in the form of a 1-hour single-session face-to-face interview structured by a series of topics. MEASUREMENTS Changes in self-reported cigarette, alcohol, cannabis and other drug use and in a range of drug-specific perceptions and other indicators of risk and harm. Measurement at recruitment and follow-up interview 3 months later. FINDINGS A good follow-up rate (89.5%; 179 of 200) was achieved. In comparison to the control group, those randomized to motivational interviewing reduced their of use of cigarettes, alcohol and cannabis, mainly through moderation of ongoing drug use rather than cessation. Effect sizes were 0.37 (0.15-0.6), 0.34 (0.09-0.59) and 0.75 (0.45-1.0) for reductions in the use of cigarettes, alcohol and cannabis, respectively. For both alcohol and cannabis, the effect was greater among heavier users of these drugs and among heavier cigarette smokers. The reduced cannabis use effect was also greater among youth usually considered vulnerable or high-risk according to other criteria. Change was also evident in various indicators of risk and harm, but not as widely as the changes in drug consumption. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first substantial evidence of non-treatment benefit to be derived among young people involved in illegal drug use in receipt of motivational interviewing. The targeting of multiple drug use in a generic fashion among young people has also been supported.

[1]  W. Hall,et al.  Choosing a diagnostic cut-off for cannabis dependence. , 1998, Addiction.

[2]  Josephine Spiller,et al.  Drug misuse declared in 1996: Latest results from the British crime survey: Home office research study 172 , 1997 .

[3]  R. Stephens,et al.  Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[4]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational Interviewing with Problem Drinkers , 1983, Behavioural Psychotherapy.

[5]  J. Strang,et al.  Changes in cigarette smoking among alcohol and drug misusers during inpatient detoxification , 2000, Addiction biology.

[6]  Wales.,et al.  Drug Use, Smoking And Drinking Among Young People In England In 2001 , 2002 .

[7]  N. Heather,et al.  Development of a short 'readiness to change' questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. , 1992, British journal of addiction.

[8]  Malcolm Ramsay,et al.  Drug misuse declared in 2000: results from the British Crime Survey , 2001 .

[9]  B Powis,et al.  The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. , 1995, Addiction.

[10]  Paul D. Williams,et al.  A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire , 1988 .

[11]  F Beauvais,et al.  Adolescent drug use: findings of national and local surveys. , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  S. Darke,et al.  Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. , 1998, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[13]  J. Strang,et al.  Development of a structured generic drug intervention model for public health purposes: a brief application of motivational interviewing with young people. , 2003, Drug and alcohol review.

[14]  G. Stimson.  AIDS and injecting drug use in the United Kingdom, 1987-1993: the policy response and the prevention of the epidemic. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[15]  S. Lenton,et al.  The definition of harm reduction. , 1998, Drug and alcohol review.

[16]  Stephen Rollnick,et al.  Negotiating behaviour change in medical settings: The development of brief motivational interviewing , 1992 .

[17]  Leicha Rickards,et al.  Living in Britain : results from the 2002 General Household Survey , 2004 .

[18]  Wayne F. Velicer,et al.  Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report. , 1989 .

[19]  Lana D. Harrison,et al.  The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use , 1995 .

[20]  N. Tobler.  Meta-analysis of Adolescent Drug Prevention Programs: Results of the 1993 Meta-analysis Additional Criteria for a Subset of Higher Quality Experimental Studies Pooling Effect Sizes over Test Intervals for a Single Program , 1993 .

[21]  B Powis,et al.  Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: methodological and practical issues. , 1993, Addiction.

[22]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior , 1991 .

[23]  R. Woolard,et al.  Brief motivational interviewing in a hospital setting for adolescent smoking: a preliminary study. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[24]  K. Carey,et al.  Assessing Readiness to Change Substance Abuse: A Critical Review of Instruments , 2006 .

[25]  M. Argyle.  The Psychology of Happiness , 1986 .

[26]  J Chick,et al.  Counselling problem drinkers in medical wards: a controlled study. , 1985, British medical journal.

[27]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. , 2002 .

[28]  J. Strang.  DRUG-USE AND HARM REDUCTION - RESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGE , 1992 .

[29]  Tobler Ns,et al.  Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: results of the 1993 meta-analysis. , 1997 .

[30]  M. Russell,et al.  Effect of general practitioners' advice against smoking , 1979, British medical journal.

[31]  J. Strang,et al.  Preventing and curtailing injecting drug use: a review of opportunities for developing and delivering 'route transition interventions' , 1999 .

[32]  Nick Heather.  Groundwork for a research programme on harm reduction in alcohol and drug treatment. , 1995, Drug and Alcohol Review.

[33]  D. Kandel,et al.  The consequences in young adulthood of adolescent drug involvement. An overview. , 1986, Archives of general psychiatry.

[34]  G A Marlatt,et al.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  D. Lister-Sharp,et al.  Alcohol misuse prevention for young people: a systematic review reveals methodological concerns and lack of reliable evidence of effectiveness. , 1997, Addiction.

[36]  K. Cummings,et al.  Ability of smokers to reduce their smoking and its association with future smoking cessation. , 1999, Addiction.

[37]  S. Bailey,et al.  Dimensions of adolescent problem drinking. , 1993, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[38]  R. Woolard,et al.  Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[39]  W. Miller.  Rediscovering fire: small interventions, large effects. , 2000, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[40]  Alison Walker,et al.  Living in Britain : results from the 2001 General Household Survey , 2001 .

[41]  J. Barber,et al.  Brief Intervention Strategies for the Prevention of Youth Suicide , 2002 .

[42]  Stephen Rollnick,et al.  Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd Edition , 2002 .

[43]  Tx Station.  Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. , 2001 .

[44]  Fiona Measham,et al.  Dancing on Drugs: Risk, Health and Hedonism in the British Club scene , 2000 .

[45]  J. Anthony,et al.  Early-onset drug use and risk of later drug problems. , 1995, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[46]  M. Larimer,et al.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers , 1998 .

[47]  J. Strang.  AIDS and Drug Misuse in the UK-10 Years on: Achievements, failings and new harm reduction opportunities , 1998 .

[48]  P. Willner,et al.  Patterns of alcohol, cigarette and illicit drug use in English adolescents. , 1998, Addiction.

[49]  Wales,et al.  Smoking, drinking and drug use among young people in England in 2002 , 2003 .

[50]  L. A. Lawendowski.  A motivational intervention for adolescent smokers. , 1998, Preventive medicine.

[51]  D. Fergusson,et al.  Does cannabis use encourage other forms of illicit drug use? , 2000, Addiction.

[52]  E. Lang,et al.  Report of an integrated brief intervention with self-defined problem cannabis users. , 2000, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[53]  W. Miller,et al.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. , 1993, Addiction.

[54]  M. Pitts,et al.  Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review. , 1998, Addiction.

[55]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of a community intervention to prevent adolescent tobacco use , 2000, Tobacco control.

[56]  S. Pocock.  Clinical trials with multiple outcomes: a statistical perspective on their design, analysis, and interpretation. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[57]  G. Botvin,et al.  Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. , 1995, JAMA.

[58]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Guideline. Findings and implications for psychologists. , 1998, American Psychologist.