Encoding of shape and orientation of objects indented into the monkey fingerpad by populations of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors.

The peripheral neural representation of object shape and orientation was studied by recording the responses of a spatially distributed population of rapidly and slowly adapting type I mechanoreceptors (RAs and SAs, respectively) to objects of different shapes and orientations indented at a fixed location on the fingerpad of the anesthetized monkey. The toroidal objects had a radius of 5 mm on the major axis, and 1, 3, or 5 mm on the minor axis. Each object was indented into the fingerpad for 4 s at orientations of 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees using a contact force of 15 gwt. Estimations of the population responses (PRs) were constructed by combining the responses of 91 SA and 97 RA single afferents at discrete times during the indentation. The PR was composed of the neural discharge rates (z coordinate) plotted at x and y coordinates of the most sensitive spot of the receptive field. The shapes of the PRs were related to the shapes of the objects by fitting the PRs with Gaussian surfaces. The orientations of the PRs were determined from weighted principal component analyses. The SA PR encoded both the orientation and shape of the objects, whereas the RA PR did neither. The SA PR orientation was biased toward the long axis of the finger. The RA PR encoded orientation only for the object with the highest curvature but did so ambiguously. Only the SA PR was well fit by a Gaussian surface. The shape of the object was discriminated by the SA PR within the first 500 ms of contact, and the form of the SA PR remained constant during the subsequent 3.5 s. This was manifested by constant widths of the PR along the major and minor axes despite a peak response that decreased from its maximum at 200 ms to an asymptotic value starting at 1 s. Thus the shape and orientation of each object were coded by the shape and orientation of the SA PR.

[1]  D. F. Morrison,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods , 1968 .

[2]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[3]  M. Knibestöl Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  M. Hulliger,et al.  The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  I. Darian‐Smith,et al.  Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  K O Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  B H Pubols Factors affecting cutaneous mechanoreceptor response. I. Constant-force versus constant-displacement stimulation. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  K. Horch,et al.  The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  K W Horch,et al.  The neural signal for skin indentation depth. II. Steady indentations , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  K W Horch,et al.  The neural signal for the intensity of a tactile stimulus , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step indented into the monkey fingerpad , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Srinivasan Surface deflection of primate fingertip under line load. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Using a cylindrical tactile sensor for determining curvature , 1988, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Encoding of Shape in the Responses of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors , 1991 .

[18]  A W Goodwin,et al.  Magnitude estimation of contact force when objects with different shapes are applied passively to the fingerpad. , 1992, Somatosensory & motor research.

[19]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Role of fingertip geometry in the transmission of tactile mechanical signals , 1992 .

[20]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  3 dimensional finite element model of the monkey fingertip for predicting responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors , 1995 .

[23]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  An investigation of the mechanics of tactile sense using two-dimensional models of the primate fingertip. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  M A Srinivasan,et al.  Neural encoding of shape: responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to a wavy surface stroked across the monkey fingerpad. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.