Normalisation method and data for Environmental Footprints

According to ISO 14044 (ISO 2006), normalisation, in the context of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), is an optional step of Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) which allows the practitioner to express results after the characterisation step using a common reference impact. This supports the comparison between alternatives using reference numerical scores. The normalisation factors express the total impact occurring in a reference region for a certain impact category (e.g. climate change, eutrophication, etc.) within a reference year. This document provides normalisation factors (NFs) for the implementation of the EU Environmental Footprint methodology (EC European Commission, 2013). The calculation of NFs is based on a ’EU-27 domestic inventory’ i.e. an extensive collection of emissions into air, water and soil as well as resources extracted in EU-27 with reference to 2010 (Sala et al., 2014). The International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) impact assessment methods and related characterisation factors (EC-JRC, 2011) were applied to the domestic inventory so to calculate the normalisation factors. In this report, the main methodological steps used to calculate the normalisation factors are described and discussed, and an overview is given of the improvements of current figures compared to similar studies (CML, 2013; Wegener Sleeswijk, et al., 2008; Wegener Sleeswijk and Huijbregts, 2010). Although the consideration of international trade in normalisation factors would allow for a more comprehensive picture of the actual environmental impacts due to EU production and consumption processes, this study shows, through a comparative assessment, that the present level of methodological development and data availability in modelling trade are not sufficiently mature. The main reasons are: i) significant variability in the results obtained using different methods for selecting and up-scaling products; ii) the ratio of imports to domestic products appears to be underestimated. The recommendation for normalisation factors in the Environmental Footprint context is therefore to rely on domestic figures for 2010. 3 Normalisation method and data for Environmental Footprints Suggested citation Benini L., Mancini L., Sala S., Manfredi S., Schau E. M., Pant R. 2014 Normalisation method and data for Environmental Footprints. European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg, ISBN: 978-92-79-40847-2

[1]  Carlo Lavalle,et al.  Mapping current and future European public water withdrawals and consumption , 2013 .

[2]  John A. Harrison,et al.  Global nitrogen and phosphate in urban wastewater for the period 1970 to 2050 , 2009 .

[3]  岩崎 民子.  SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[4]  Fabian Wagner,et al.  GAINS - An Interactive Tool for Assessing International GHG Mitigation Regimes , 2011, ICT-GLOW.

[5]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Spatial patterns of mobile source particulate matter emissions-to-exposure relationships across the United States , 2007 .

[6]  Arthur H. W. Beusen,et al.  Global modeling of the fate of nitrogen from point and nonpoint sources in soils, groundwater, and surface water , 2003 .

[7]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment , 2000 .

[8]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  Impacts of NMVOC emissions on human health in European countries for 2000–2010: Use of sector-specific substance profiles , 2014 .

[9]  L. J. Anthony.  World Mineral Statistics 1996‐2000 , 2002 .

[10]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Normalization in EDIP97 and EDIP2003: updated European inventory for 2004 and guidance towards a consistent use in practice , 2011 .

[11]  Oei,et al.  Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program , 2013 .

[12]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[13]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Life-cycle impact assessment of acidifying and eutrophying air pollutants. Calculation of equivalency factors with RAINS-LCA. , 1999 .

[14]  Greet Janssens-Maenhout,et al.  EDGAR-HTAP: A harmonized gridded air pollution emission dataset based on national inventories , 2012 .

[15]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2007 .

[17]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Commission Recommendation on the use ofcommon methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performanceof products and organisations , 2013 .

[18]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .